What Is the Potential Along the X-Axis Due to Two Point Charges on the Y-Axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential along the x-axis due to two positive point charges located at +-(1/2)s on the y-axis. The potential V is derived using the formula V = (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/r, where r is the distance from the point on the x-axis to the charges. The distance r is determined using the Pythagorean theorem, resulting in r = sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2). By substituting this distance into the potential formula, the expression for the potential along the x-axis is confirmed as V = (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/(2*(sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2))). This approach highlights the principle of superposition in calculating electric potentials from multiple point charges.
quick
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Two positive point charges q are located on the y-axis at +-(1/2)s. Find an expression for the potential along the x-axis.
Express your answer in terms of epsilon_0, pi, q, x, and s.

for this one, i know V = (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/r.
so i was thinking its just like finding the potential of multiple point charges, at + and - 1/2s. and this is along the x-axis so it will be at an angle. so i could use sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2) as the distance. so would this be right: (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/(2*(sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2))) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,electric potential is a scalar which obeys the principle of superposition,valid in linear electrodynamics...So you have to add them and yes,for generality,use x\neq 0 and Pythagora's theorem...

Daniel.
 


Your approach is correct. The potential at a point on the x-axis due to two point charges located at +-(1/2)s on the y-axis can be calculated using the formula V = (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/r, where r is the distance between the point on the x-axis and the two point charges. Since the point charges are located on the y-axis, the distance r can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem as r = sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2). Substituting this value of r in the formula, we get V = (1/4*pi*epsilon_0)*q/(2*(sqrt((1/2s)^2 + x^2))), which is the correct expression for the potential along the x-axis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top