What is the Potential Difference in a Non-Uniform Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field in the problem is non-uniform, with Ex = (4.00 N/C·m) x and Ey = Ez = 0. To find the potential difference VB - VA, the integral Vb - Vi = -∫ba E * dS must be used, but the simple formula ΔV = Ed is not applicable due to the non-uniformity of the field. The correct potential difference calculated is -18V, which arises from integrating along a suitable path between the two points on different axes. The significance of the y-coordinate at point A is also discussed in relation to the integration process. Understanding the nature of the electric field is crucial for accurately determining potential differences in such scenarios.
PhysicsInNJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The electric field in a region of space has the components Ey = Ez = 0 and Ex = (4.00 N/C·m) x. Point A is on the y axis at y = 3.60 m, and Point B is on thex axis at x = 3.00 m. What is the potential difference VBVA?

Homework Equations


Vb- Vi = -∫ba E * dS

The Attempt at a Solution


The integral should become E*d, or 4*0.6 , but that is incorrect
The correct answer is -18V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsInNJ said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The integral should become E*d, or 4*0.6 , but that is incorrect
The correct answer is -18V
Where does the 0.6 come from? Note that the two points are on different axes.
 
What's a good choice of path integration? Does the datum y = 3.6, as opposed to some other y number, have any significance?
 
PhysicsInNJ said:
The integral should become E*d
In addition to what the others said, ##\Delta V = Ed## only holds for uniform fields. You don't have a uniform field in this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top