What is the potential difference Vad-Vac?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dwstrait
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Switch
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference Vcd in a circuit with initially uncharged capacitors connected to a 210 V source. The equivalent capacitance of the series was determined to be 4 x 10^-6 F, leading to a charge calculation of 8.4 x 10^-4 C. The user initially attempted to find the voltages Vad and Vac using the formula V=Q/C but later realized that each series had half the charge. Ultimately, the calculated values were Vad=140V and Vac=70V, resulting in a potential difference of Vad-Vac=70V. The problem was successfully solved by correctly applying the principles of capacitance and charge distribution.
dwstrait
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement
The capacitors in the figure are initially uncharged and are connected, as in the diagram, with switch S open. The applied potential difference is Vab = + 210 V.

What is the potential difference Vcd?

YF-24-60.jpg


Homework Equations


(series) 1/C = 1/c1 + 1/c2 + ...
(parallel) C = c1 + c2 + ...
C=Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution


Trying to find Vcd:
I first found the equivalent capacitance of the series, which is 4*10-6 F. I calculated the charge on the capacitors using Q = CV, which was 8.4*10-4. Then, I tried to find Vad and Vac by using V=Q/C. I don't think this is the right way to do this problem though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like the way to do it as far as you went.
 
Ah, I figured it out. The upper and lower series each have half the value of the charge that I calculated. Then using V=QC, Vad=140V and Vac=70V, so Vad-Vac=70V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top