What is the primary cause of rolling resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Rolling resistance primarily arises from hysteresis, which is the energy loss that occurs when a material deforms under load and then recovers as it rolls. This deformation creates internal friction within the material, contributing to resistance. Additionally, static friction plays a role, as the point of contact remains static during rolling, influenced by surface roughness and molecular interactions like Van der Waals forces. Some theories suggest that rolling creates a hump in front of the object, but this view is debated. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing performance in applications involving rolling objects.
kamaljeet_pec
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In solids there are crests and troughs. In highly polished surfaces there are molecular forces. But what creates friction during rolling where there is only line contact (in case of cylinder) or point contact (inn case of a ring)?

I read somewhere that when an object is rolling it forms a hump in front of it on the surface on which it is rolling. Thats what opposes it and hence is a cause of friction. I don't really buy that.

Please help me understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When an object is rolling and not slipping, the point of contact is static, therefore the friction is static friction. It is the same thing that keeps a block of wood from sliding down a rubber ramp. Static friction is due to surface roughness as well as an electromagnetic attraction of the molecules in both surfaces when close together because of slight induced charge dipoles (the Van der Waals force). Geckos can stick to sheer vertical surfaces because their fingers have pads that optimize the Van der Waals force.
 
kamaljeet_pec said:
I read somewhere that when an object is rolling it forms a hump in front of it on the surface on which it is rolling. Thats what opposes it and hence is a cause of friction. I don't really buy that.
The opposition to rolling is called rolling resistance. From a wiki article:

The primary cause of rolling resistance is hysteresis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_resistance
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top