I What is the probability of a cable having a breaking load greater than 6200 N?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter rexxii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Value
rexxii
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Probability - z value - stats issue
Hi,

I'm working on a question now where I need to calculate the z value. which I have been able to but I'm calculating a value off the normal distribution that is on the left-hand side of the normal distribution curve and it needs to on the right side. As the value I'm looking into is higher than the mean!

I cannot figure out how I would turn this around. its only one independent event there's no replacement or other variables.

the question is:

A cable manufacturer tests the cables it produces to find the breaking load. Over many years this has been assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 6000 Newtons and standard deviation of 155 Newtons. Calculate the probability that a single cable chosen at random, will have a breaking load greater than 6200 N. Z = 6200 -6000 /155 = 1.29

Then I've written a probability statement (P z>1.290) = P z>1.290)

read from the stats tables that it could be 0.9015.

Said the breaking load is 90.15%

I know this is incorrect please can you advise The probability that a randomly selected cable will have a breaking load greater breaking load than 6200 Newtons is 90%.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rexxii said:
Summary: Probability - z value - stats issue

Hi,

I'm working on a question now where I need to calculate the z value. which I have been able to but I'm calculating a value off the normal distribution that is on the left-hand side of the normal distribution curve and it needs to on the right side. As the value I'm looking into is higher than the mean!

I cannot figure out how I would turn this around. its only one independent event there's no replacement or other variables.

the question is:

A cable manufacturer tests the cables it produces to find the breaking load. Over many years this has been assumed to be normally distributed with a mean of 6000 Newtons and standard deviation of 155 Newtons. Calculate the probability that a single cable chosen at random, will have a breaking load greater than 6200 N. Z = 6200 -6000 /155 = 1.29

Then I've written a probability statement (P z>1.290) = P z>1.290)

read from the stats tables that it could be 0.9015.
You're reading the table wrong. The table is giving you P(z < 1.290) = 0.9015. So what would be the probability you want, P(z > 1.290)?
rexxii said:
Said the breaking load is 90.15%

I know this is incorrect please can you advise The probability that a randomly selected cable will have a breaking load greater breaking load than 6200 Newtons is 90%.
 
So i need to read from the RHS side? as it is above the mean? Would i still select that number or a different one of the table?
 
P(z < 1.290) = .9015, from the table. The number .9015 represents the area under the standard normal curve between ##z = -\infty## and z = 1.290. What is the total area under the curve? What's the area under the curve between z = 1.290 and ##z = +\infty##?
 
1.29 - 1 = 0.29 above the mean?
 
rexxii said:
1.29 - 1 = 0.29 above the mean?
No, and this doesn't make any sense -- you're mixing two unrelated things there: the z-value and the probability associated with a certain z-value.

Have you seen a graph of the standard normal curve? In the standard normal distribution, half of the area under the curve is to the left of the mean at z = 0, and the other half is to the right. What's the total area under the curve? How much of the area under the curve lies to the left of z = 1.29? How much of the area lies to the right of z = 1.29?

It would be a good idea to read the section in your textbook that has this problem. There's quite a bit you don't understand.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top