What is the probability of solving 500 random questions correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmedhassan72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riddle
AI Thread Summary
The probability of solving 500 random questions correctly, assuming each question has two possible answers, is calculated as 1 divided by 3.273390608 * 10^150. This results in a probability of approximately 0.3054936364 * 10^-148 percent. The discussion emphasizes that the number of combinations for answering the questions is 2^500, which is an extremely large number. The calculations involve logarithmic transformations to simplify the expression. The final conclusion confirms the accuracy of the probability derived.
ahmedhassan72
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Solve my simple riddle!

If you have 500 questions (put right or wrong questions) and you will solve them all randomly as you don't know the answer so what is your probability to solve them all right?
express answer as e.g 1.5*10^-2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This seems more like homework than a riddle...
 
If you have 500 questions (put right or wrong questions) and you will solve them all randomly as you don't know the answer so what is your probability to solve them all right?
express answer as e.g 1.5*10^-2
( don't think to try combinations one by one)
You can easily solve that 2 right or wrong questions have 2 answer probabilities, 3 right or wrong or wrong questions have 8 answer probabilities , and so on... so the number of combinations which you can get =number of one question probabilities ^number of questions
so 500 questions combinations = 2^500 ( can't be solved by most calculators)
so let 2^500 =x
so log 2^500 = log x
so 500log 2 =log x
so x=10^(500log2)
=10^150.5149978
=10^150 * 10^5149978
=3.273390608 * 10^150
probability of solving them all right = 1/(3.273390608* 10^150) *100 =
=======0.3054936364 * 10 ^-148 percent
( i imagined of that problem and i solved it so it may be wrong)
 
Last edited:
Yes, its correct.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top