What is the process for determining Fourier coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
member 428835
hey pf!

can someone explain to me what to do if presented with an equation like this: \sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i=i
is this identical to stating A_i=i? either way, can you please explain.

thanks!

josh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
joshmccraney said:
hey pf!

can someone explain to me what to do if presented with an equation like this: \sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i=i
is this identical to stating A_i=i? either way, can you please explain.

thanks!

josh
It doesn't make much sense to me. On the left side, i is an index variable that takes on the values 1, 2, 3, ..., n, so I have no idea what it means on the right side.

Where did you see this? If it's from a textbook, can you post a picture?
 
Just taking it at face value, it means
##A_1 + A_2 + \cdots + A_n = i##

The ##i## in the sum is a "bound variable" or "dummy variable". You could replace it by anything else (except ##n##) without changing the meaning. The ##i## on the right hand side means ##i##.

But using ##i## twice in one equation like that is horrible, as Mark44 said. It would have been more literate to write something like
$$\sum_{k=1}^n A_k = i$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top