What is the purpose of defining the matter tensor in general relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Proof.Beh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Tensor
Proof.Beh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Why we define the matter tensor to this form '
T_m.JPG
' on general relativity?
Is it a physical supposal only? Or we can explain a mathematical proof for it?

Thanks.
-----------
Mr Beh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this expression ignores the pressure terms, so it's not quite right as written.

The Lagrangian density representing matter, though, is just a scalar field, -\rho_0 according to my recent readings. As to why a scalar field is used for matter. I think that's because that's a convenient approximation. We model matter by some distribution of energy - when you stretch matter, doing work, this energy is stored somewhere. Rather than obsess about exactly where and in what form this energy is stored, the usual approximation is to say that this energy is uniformly distributed - this gives a scalar field approximation.

GR also allows one to use stress-energy tensors for other sorts of fields (Dirac fields, and spin-1 fields for example). The ultimate point is that any sort of Lagrangian field is going to have a stress-energy tensor, so any sort of Lagrangian field theory is going to be representable in Einstein's equation by it's associated stress-energy tensor.
 
Thanks for your beautiful answer,

But note that these approximations (according to you) that we see at relativity and others, such as field theory of Nordstrom, for probability of QM are valid and we must try to solve the their problemes instead of extension QM (& string theory).

All the best,
Mr Beh
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top