What is the Q-value of the Deuterium (d,p) Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirtyhippy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deuterium Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the Q-value of the deuterium (d,p) reaction, focusing on the binding energies involved. The binding energy of the deuteron is identified as E=2.225 MeV, with the mass of the deuteron noted as 1875.628 MeV. Participants express confusion regarding the specifics of the reaction, particularly the roles of deuterium and the proton, and the clarity of the original French source material. Suggestions include consulting a professor for clarification and acknowledging potential translation issues. The conversation highlights the complexities of cross-disciplinary topics in physics and chemistry.
dirtyhippy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Express the energy (Or heat of the reaction Q) of the reaction (d,p) as a function of the binding energy of deuterium and the binding energy of the neutron captured by the target.


Homework Equations



Bn / A ≈ 8 MeV

Bn = Binding energy, A = Atomic Number

Q = E(reactants) - E(products)



The Attempt at a Solution



This problem is translated form a french paper hence the lack of clarity,
basically our attempts involved finding the Binding energy of deuteron is E=2.225MeV, and the mass of deuteron is 1875.628MeV.


This means that m(d)-m(p)-m(n)=2.225MeV.

and that's where I am stuck?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is deuterium the target or is it the product? Your question is leaving out some details. Also what is 'd' and 'p'? It is also best if you write out the whole chemical formula.
 
See this is on a french physics handout which has me bewildered as I'm not a chemist, but a little cross discipline never hurt.

I think the d,p refers to deuterium proton which decays to a neutron. I think i'll go see my Professor and ask exactly what he's asking and post it up as I can't seem to find this example or solution anywhere, so it may be of useful reference to someone in the future.

Could just be shoddy translation on my part. I suspect.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top