What is the relation between redshift and absorption lines in galaxies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redshift
AI Thread Summary
Redshift is a measure of how much the wavelength of light from a galaxy is stretched as it moves away from us. In the example provided, two absorption lines at 400 nm and 500 nm correspond to original emissions at 200 nm and 300 nm, resulting in different redshift values for each line. This indicates that the lines may not originate from the same object, as a single object would exhibit a consistent redshift across all its spectral lines. Factors influencing redshift include the object's relative velocity, gravitational effects, and the Doppler effect. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting the absorption lines in the context of galaxy movement.
nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I understand the concept, but not the math.

For example, let's say a galaxy is moving away from us, and we observe one absorption line at 400 nm, and another absorption line at 500 nm. Let's also say that we determine that the radiation was emitted originally at 200 nm and 300 nm respectively. Then according to the formula for redshift,

z = \frac{\lambda-\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{0}} = \frac{500-300}{300} \approx 0.67

and

z = \frac{400-200}{200} = 1

Does this mean that every line measured will have a different redshift? Or am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nietzsche said:
I understand the concept, but not the math.

For example, let's say a galaxy is moving away from us, and we observe one absorption line at 400 nm, and another absorption line at 500 nm. Let's also say that we determine that the radiation was emitted originally at 200 nm and 300 nm respectively. Then according to the formula for redshift,

z = \frac{\lambda-\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{0}} = \frac{500-300}{300} \approx 0.67

and

z = \frac{400-200}{200} = 1

Does this mean that every line measured will have a different redshift? Or am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance.

The two lines you describe are redshifted by different factors. Specifically, the multiplier for redshifting one line is not the same for redshifting the other line. So one would have to assume the lines are not from the same object. For a given object, the wavelengths of all its lines are shifted by the same constant multiplier, and its value depends on several factors (object's relative velocity, gravitational redshifting, and Doppler effect).
 
fleem said:
The two lines you describe are redshifted by different factors. Specifically, the multiplier for redshifting one line is not the same for redshifting the other line. So one would have to assume the lines are not from the same object. For a given object, the wavelengths of all its lines are shifted by the same constant multiplier, and its value depends on several factors (object's relative velocity, gravitational redshifting, and Doppler effect).

Thanks!
 
Back
Top