What is the relationship between impact parameter and billiard ball collisions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ordinarydaysx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact Parameter
ordinarydaysx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My problem has to do with impact parameter of two billiard balls. I don't want my problem solved persay, I just want to understand the problem, as I have a few things I am unclear about. If impact parameter is what "would've been the distance of the closet approach of the centers" doesn't that just mean it's the distance between the two centers if the balls were together? And when given the impact parameter, how do I approach a problem that asks us to find the angle the balls were at when they hit?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Say the two billiards balls are on a collision course with one another, so that their lines of motion are parallel but do not necessarily coincide. The impact parameter is the perpendicular distance between their parallel lines of motion.

If they were to collide head-on, and their initial lines of motion were parallel, then the impact parameter would be zero because their lines of motion now coincide. But the distance of closest approach would not be zero:

The distance of closest approach for a collision between two billiard balls is the distance between their centres when they are touching. If they don't actually collide, then the impact parameter becomes the distance of closest approach if their lines of motion are parallel.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top