What is the relationship between mass and weight?

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between mass and weight is defined by the equation w = m⋅g, where weight (w) is the force of gravity acting on a mass (m). While mass is an intrinsic property of an object, weight depends on both mass and the gravitational acceleration (g), which is approximately constant near Earth's surface. Although g can vary with location and height, it is often treated as constant for practical purposes. This proportionality means that as mass increases, weight also increases, making them interchangeable in many contexts. Understanding this relationship is crucial in scientific and technological applications.
harry_thawne
Messages
1
Reaction score
4
What does it mean that the relationship between mass and weight is constant and proportional?
I think I don't get it yet. The weight depends of mass, but at the same time depends of gravity, so if mass increase, the weight so does. But if we're on Earth we know that"g" has a value, therefore that "g" could be the constant in this equation that represents the relation: w=m⋅g, Is that the reason why the relationship between this two magnitudes is constant and proportional?
I hope I have explained myself well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may wish to read this.
 
harry_thawne said:
Summary:: What does it mean that the relationship between mass and weight is constant and proportional?

But if we're on Earth we know that"g" has a value, therefore that "g" could be the constant in this equation that represents the relation: w=m⋅g, Is that the reason why the relationship between this two magnitudes is constant and proportional?

Yes, insofar as ##g## is constant.

There are other ways of using the term weight, but what you describe is the way it's used in science and technology.
 
Weight is the force of gravity on a mass (typically, a mass that is not in freefall with respect to the source of the gravity). Because most human-related measurements and discussions occur near Earth's surface, we can take the proportionality between mass and weight to be g. g is not truly constant, it changes with location and height, but it's useful enough to treat it as constant for most things. If you're launching a rocket into orbit, then you have to be more nuanced.

This is also related to the units we use to describe mass and weight. When we talk about a pound we could mean a pound of mass (454 grams) or a pound of force (~4.4 Newtons), but the distinction doesn't matter as long as we stay near Earth's surface.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, bhobba and sysprog
Just to try and give a short answer. Mass is an intrinsic property of an object as expressed in the definition of force F=ma. Gravity accelerates objects with a constant acceleration regardless of mass. Since F=ma that means it experiences a force from gravity - sometimes called weight. Since acceleration is constant the force and hence weight is proportional to mass. Because of that they are in some contexts used interchangeably, but really are two different things.

Thanks
Bill
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top