Chemistry What is the Relationship Between Specific Gravity and Dilution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between specific gravity and dilution in a chemistry context. Participants suggest approaching the problem by creating a scenario to simplify the math involved, such as calculating the weight of a specific volume of NaOH. Emphasis is placed on using mass fractions rather than molalities or molarities for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of breaking down the problem into manageable parts to find the required amount of water for dilution. Overall, the thread provides guidance on tackling dilution problems using specific gravity.
serendipityfox
Messages
17
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
how many grams of water to dilute 200ml noah (SG 1.32, 28.83%) to solution SG 1.157, 13.55%
Relevant Equations
sg= density x / density h20
i am nonplussed about how to proceed with this dilution, probably it is very simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hellp fox, :welcome: !

Work out your homework equation to turn this into a simple math problem and you'll be fine.
To do this, write a scenario, something like
200 ml NaOH of SG 1.32 weighs .. grams and consists of ... gram of H2O plus ... grams of NaOH
etc.
Then convert that into an expression in terms of symbols (not numbers) for the amount of water you need to add.
 
ok! thanks
 
Here you are dealing with mass fractions, not molalities and certainly not molarities !
 
i must think about this a little more...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top