What is the Relationship Between Voltage and Current in Terms of Units?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between voltage, current, and power, emphasizing their units of measurement. It clarifies that one watt equals one joule per second, with joules expressed in base units as kg·m²/s². Voltage is defined as joules per coulomb, leading to the conclusion that one volt equals kg·m²/(A·s³), while one ampere is defined as coulombs per second. The conversation also addresses misconceptions about expressing current in terms of velocity units, confirming that amperes are a fundamental unit in the SI system and cannot be expressed as cm/s. Overall, the relationship between voltage, current, and power is mathematically validated through unit analysis.
KC9FVV
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was reading Asimov on Physics the other day, and found that a watt is a measure of gm cm^2/s^3. That got me thinking, if voltage times current equals watts, what would voltage and current be a measure of? I have been trying to figure it out for a while, and came up with: current= gm/s and voltage= cm^2/s^2. That is the only way I could make current work, but voltage just doesn't seem right to me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cody,
Watts can be expressed in various systems e.g. cgs (cm gm sec), mks (m kg sec). To convert Watts to cgs you may want look at a table of conversions in physics or engineering texts
or a verifiable online ref... for example ---> http://users.aol.com/tspquinn/units.html

1W = (1 J/s)
1 J = 10^7 ergs
1 erg = 1 dyne cm
1 dyne = 1 gm cm/s^2

So now calculate watts in cgs.

1W = (1 J/s)*(10^7erg/J)*(1dyne cm/erg)*[(1 gm cm/s^2)/dyne]
cancel J, erg,dyne... leaving you 1W (cgs) = 10^7 gm cm^2/s^3

Which makes sense because converting this to mks
(10^7 gm cm^2/s^3)(1m/100cm)(1m/100cm)(1kg/1000gm) =
(10^7 gm cm^2/s^3)[1m^2 kg/(10^4 cm^2 10^3 gm)] =
cancel gm, cm^2 ...
10^7 kg m^2/ ((10^4*10^3) s^3) so 1W (mks) = 1 kg m^2 /s^3

So cgs and mks systems differ by constant factor 10^7,
if i choose to stay in mks (table including voltage an current)
e.g. ref ---> http://www.csee.umbc.edu/help/theory/units.shtml

I can go through a similar derivation for voltage and current but you get the idea, to save time I obtain the following:

1V = 1 (kg m^2)/( s^2 c)
1A = 1 c/s

1W(mks) = (kg m^2 c)/ (s^2 s c) , cancel c (c - Coulombs)
= 1 kg m^2/ s^3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, but I still have one question. How can amperage - measured by the number of electrons that go by a certain point in a certain amount of time - be measured using cm/s? With mass I could see... 1.24 quintillion electrons weigh a certain amount, but how do 1.24 quintillion electrons have a length?
 
I didn't read the preceding post, but there is no way that amperes can be expressed in cm/s -- those are units of velocity! In fact, the ampere is fundamental unit in the SI system, just like the metre, kilogram, and second.

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html

It is not a derived unit, so it cannot be expressed in terms of these other three. Current was a physical quantity that demanded a new unit of measure. I won't try to state the official def'n of the ampere, because I'll get it wrong. You're better off looking it up. I think it has something to do with "the current required to produce _______ amount of force between two infinitely long, parallel, current - carrying wires." The ampere has, in turn, been used to define the coulomb (the amount of charge passing a point in one second when there is 1 A of current). I'm not sure whether current has a different unit in the cgs system, which you seem to be using, but I don't think so. I remember reading also that there is no British system of electrical units. Thankfully.

One volt is one joule per coulomb (J/C), which makes sense because voltage is actually potential difference. E.g. the potential difference between two terminals can be interpreted as the potential energy per unit charge gained or lost as charge flows between the terminals. So it makes sense that the voltage drop across a resistor for example, times the current flowing through that resistor, gives you the power dissipated. For you have joules lost per coulomb times coulombs going by per second = joules lost per second.
Mathematically: J/C * C/s = J/s = W


But you wanted to see everything in base units:

J = \frac{kg\cdot m^2}{s^2}

V = \frac{J}{C} = \frac{J}{A\cdot s} = \frac{kg\cdot m^2}{A\cdot s^3}

W = V\cdot A = \frac{kg\cdot m^2}{s^3}
 
KC9FVV said:
Thanks, but I still have one question. How can amperage - measured by the number of electrons that go by a certain point in a certain amount of time - be measured using cm/s? With mass I could see... 1.24 quintillion electrons weigh a certain amount, but how do 1.24 quintillion electrons have a length?

You misread. The units given were c/s not CM. An amp is a coulomb/second or C/s.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top