What Is the Resistance of a Toroidal Conductor Segment?

runnergirl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a segment of a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) resistor with a horizontal cross-section (see attachment for the figure). Show that the resistance between the flat ends having a circular cross-section is given by
R = \frac{\phi_o}{σπ(√b-√a)^2}


Homework Equations


Laplace's equation: \nabla^2\phi = 0.
E-field in terms of the potential: E=-\nabla\phi
(both for cylindrical coordinates)
I = ∫J\cdot dA
J = σE
R = \frac{\phi}{I}

The Attempt at a Solution


From Laplace's equation we know that the potential will only vary with the angle

\phi and it will vary linearly : \phi = k_1\phi+k_2

due to BC \phi(0) = 0 = k_2 and \phi(\phi_o) = k_1\phi_o = V_o

the E-field is \frac{-k_1}{r}\phi-direction

Using the equation for the current: I = ∫-σk_1∫\frac{1}{r}drdz where the dz portion is the height of the strip and the integrand goes from a to b (the change of radius).

Where I'm having issue is setting up the height of the strip. If you look at the attached picture I've drawn out what I think should be the height, but the integral gets pretty complex and I get some complex numbers when I apply the limits. If someone would please show me my mistake, I would be most grateful.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 769
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you got a figure describing the problem? I can't figure out where the connection to the resistor are made. If I cut the toroid at a c ross-section & stretched it out, would the connections be to the two freed ends? Can't be that simple I guess ...
PLUS - the problem's answer makes no sense. How can resistance be proportional to potential? Are you sure you copied the problem correctly?
 
The figure is that pie shaped figure in the beginning that I drew on the attachment. That zoomed in circle is also similar to what they show as well with the dr strip and radius, r.

Using Ohm's Law is how you relate the potential difference between the flat ends and the current flowing through the wedge. So \phi = IR and solve for R.

I included the question word for word out of the book. And on the attachment I included both figures that would given with the problem.

Thanks for helping again.
 
runnergirl said:

Homework Statement


Consider a segment of a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) resistor with a horizontal cross-section (see attachment for the figure). Show that the resistance between the flat ends having a circular cross-section is given by
R = \frac{\phi_o}{σπ(√b-√a)^2}


Homework Equations


Laplace's equation: \nabla^2\phi = 0.
E-field in terms of the potential: E=-\nabla\phi
(both for cylindrical coordinates)
I = ∫J\cdot dA
J = σE
R = \frac{\phi}{I}

The Attempt at a Solution


From Laplace's equation we know that the potential will only vary with the angle

\phi and it will vary linearly : \phi = k_1\phi+k_2

due to BC \phi(0) = 0 = k_2 and \phi(\phi_o) = k_1\phi_o = V_o

the E-field is \frac{-k_1}{r}\phi-direction

Using the equation for the current: I = ∫-σk_1∫\frac{1}{r}drdz where the dz portion is the height of the strip and the integrand goes from a to b (the change of radius).

Where I'm having issue is setting up the height of the strip. If you look at the attached picture I've drawn out what I think should be the height, but the integral gets pretty complex and I get some complex numbers when I apply the limits. If someone would please show me my mistake, I would be most grateful.

OK, I think I finally figured out what \phi_o is. I got confused since they use
φ for both potential and angle. So \phi_o apparently represents the section of toroid cut out from a whole toroid (in other words, if it were a whole toroid, \phi_o would = 2π. Right or wrong, I will proceed on that assumption.

This would then be, as you say, somewhat similar to our old nemesis, the mag toroid, but much simpler math-wise. From your illustration (BTW some of it's missing in your scan) it looks like you set up your origin at the center of the toroid again, so we'll go with that. The equation for the cross-section circle of radius R is then

(r-r0)^2 + y^2 = R^2 where R = (b-a)/2 and r0 = (b+a)/2.

I would take a differential cross-sectional slice dy just like you did. The conductance of this cross-section, extended over the toroid angle \phi_o is

dG = (σ/\phi_or)(2√(a^2 - y^2)dr
but y^2 = R^2 - (r-r0)^2
so dG = (σ/\phi_or)(2√{a^2 - [R^2 - (r-r0)^2]}dr

where conductance = 1/resistance.

Then, just integrate G = ∫dG from r=a to r=b and finally R = 1/G.

In other words, I would not work with Laplace's equation at all. In fact, I'm not sure how to go about it that way.
 
So attached is my solution. I am off by a minus sign, but overall everything else works out nicely. The integral again isn't all that pretty but does simplify nicely. And if anyone does find the negative sign mess up (should be with applying the arcsin or somewhere in there) please let me know.
 

Attachments

  • page1.jpg
    page1.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 667
  • page2.jpg
    page2.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 757
  • page3.jpg
    page3.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 693
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top