What is the resultant displacement of a spelunker in a cave exploration?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the resultant displacement of a spelunker exploring a cave, the approach involves breaking down the movements into vector components. The spelunker moves 75.0 m north, 295 m east, 190 m at a 30.0° angle north of east, and 150 m south. It is recommended to draw a diagram to visualize the vectors and use the tip-to-tail method for vector addition. This method allows for easier calculation by sequentially adding the vectors and keeping track of their components. Ultimately, careful attention to the signs of the components will yield the resultant displacement from the cave entrance.
balling12
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


While exploring a cave, a spelunker starts at the entrance and moves the following distances: 75.0 m north, 295 m east, 190 m at an angle 30.0° north of east, and 150 m south. Find the resultant displacement from the cave entrance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what are your thoughts on how to approach it?
 
im not really sure. in my physics class the only problems we worked with had either one or two vectors. but this one has four so I am clueless.
 
balling12 said:
im not really sure. in my physics class the only problems we worked with had either one or two vectors. but this one has four so I am clueless.

Just keep adding them up, being careful with the signs of the components. Draw a diagram first -- that should help.
 
When adding four vectors graphically, some people, out of habit, will add two of them, then take the resultant and add the third vector to it, then take that resultant and add the fourth vector to it. But it might be easier to draw all four vectors at once, with the tip of one vector connected to the tail of the next one. Here's a picture of someone adding THREE vectors by the tip-to-tail method: http://www.compadre.org/precollege/items/detail.cfm?ID=7783
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top