What Is the Second Ionization Energy of Helium?

Ripsirwin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The first ionization energy of an atom is the minimum energy needed to remove one electron. For helium, this is 24.6 eV. The second ionization energy is the additional energy required to remove a second electron.

a) Calculate the second ionization energy of helium.

b)What is the total binding energy of helium (the is, the energy to take it apart into two separated electrons and a nucleus


Homework Equations



none


The Attempt at a Solution



I figure that since the first ionization energy is 24.6 eV, the second will also be 24.6 eV. But it seems too simple to be right. doesn't the other electron play into the ionization energy of the first
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easier to knock away the first electron, since it is being repelled by the other electron. The second electron is harder to knock away because it feels the full attraction of the nucleus. So you expect the second ionization energy to be larger than the first.

You need to find the binding energy of this second electron after the first has been knocked away. This is a hydrogen-like atom: look at how the binding energy of a hydrogen-like atom depends on the charge of the nucleus.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top