What is the Second Step in Feynman's Deduction of the Sound Wave Equation?

PeSoberbo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am studying the sound wave equation deducted by Feynman in his lectures. In section 47-3:

P0 + Pe = f(d0 + de) = f(d0) + de f'(d0)

Where f'(d0) stands for the derivative of f(d) evaluated at d=d0. Also, de is very small.

I do not understand the second step of the equality. Can anyone help me?
Link to the lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_47.html#Ch47-S1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
PeSoberbo said:
I am studying the sound wave equation deducted by Feynman in his lectures. In section 47-3:

P0 + Pe = f(d0 + de) = f(d0) + de f'(d0)

Where f'(d0) stands for the derivative of f(d) evaluated at d=d0. Also, de is very small.

I do not understand the second step of the equality. Can anyone help me?
Link to the lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_47.html#Ch47-S1
The last expression in your equation is only an approximation to the second expression, so '=' should really be ##\approx##. The approximation is called a linear approximation that uses a value on the tangent line at (d0, f(d0)) instead of the value at (d0 + de, f(d0 + de)).

The underlying concept is this:
$$\frac{f(d_0 + d_e) - f(d_0)}{d_e} \approx f'(d_0)$$
Multiply both sides by de and then add f(d0 to both sides to get the relationship you show.
 
Thank you Mark!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top