B What is the significance of Δx and Δp in the ideal gas entropy equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of Δx and Δp in the ideal gas entropy equation, relating them to the average energy and volume per molecule. Δp represents the change in momentum, while Δx signifies the change in position of gas molecules, which together form an area element in phase space. The relationship between Δp and energy is clarified through the expression (Δp)²/2m = E/N, indicating that the variance of momentum contributes to the average energy of the gas. The phase-space measure, Ω, is discussed in the context of classical versus quantum statistics, with quantum theory providing a clearer determination of this measure. Ultimately, the calculations and limits discussed highlight the complexities of statistical mechanics in describing ideal gases.
etotheipi
Up to an undetermined constant ##a## the entropy of an ideal gas goes like$$S = k_B N\ln \left[ a^\frac{3}{2} \left(\frac{V}{N}\right) \left(\frac{E}{N}\right)^{\frac{3}{2}} \right]$$In some notes is written:
We can consider that E/N is the average energy of each molecule and V/N is the average volume occupied by each molecule (both are therefore intensive while S is extensive). How do we relate this equation to the Boltzmann’s law of Eq. (1) and how do we determine the constant a? Clearly, if we let$$\frac{(\Delta p)^2}{2m} = \frac{E}{N},\quad (\Delta x)^3 = \frac{V}{N}$$then, roughly speaking, ##\Delta p## is the magnitude of the change of momentum of the molecules and ##\Delta x## is that of the change of position

And then they identify ##\Omega = \left(\frac{\Delta x \Delta p}{w}\right)^{3N}## from Boltzmann's formula, with ##w=\sqrt{2m/a}##.

I am confused about what ##\Delta x## and ##\Delta p## represent here. At first glance it looks like the product ##\Delta x \Delta p## represents some area element in the ##x##/##p_x## phase space, but if that is true, I don't know how we obtain the relation ##\frac{(\Delta p)^2}{2m} = \frac{E}{N}##... if anything I would have thought it be something like$$\frac{1}{N} \sum_i^N \frac{p_i^2}{2m} = \frac{E}{N}$$I hoped someone could clarify. Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\Omega## is the phase-space measure. The problem in classical statistics is the lack of a physical determination of the phase-space measure. This is of course immediately cured by quantum theory. As to be expected it turns out that ##w=h=2 \pi \hbar##, counting the number of free-particle states per phase-space-volume element. Just put free particles in a finite-volume box like a cube and assume periodic boundary conditions (it should be periodic rather than rigid boundary conditions, because otherwise you don't have a cleanly defined self-adjoint momentum operator). Then you can calculate everything and finally take the "thermodynamic limit" ##V \rightarrow \infty## for intensive quantities like particle-number density, energy density etc. The limit is not always trivial, as already the example of Bose-Einstein condensation of a free gas shows.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
I think ##\Delta p## is considered as the variance of the momentum of the particle population. It should then be calculated as
$$(\Delta p)^2=\left( \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}p_i^2\right)-\bar{p}^2$$
but ##\bar{p}=0## since it's an ideal gas.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top