What is the significance of overlap in energy bands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tsunami
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Overlap
Tsunami
Messages
88
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm using http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/" to understand my course on semiconductor physics better. In paragraph 2.3.4, the difference between insulators, semiconductors, metals is explained, based on the differences in bands. I understand the basic model.

What I don't understand, is figure 2.3.7 b) :
fig2_3_7.gif


Materials consisting of atoms that contain two valence electrons can still be highly conducting if the resulting filled band overlaps with an empty band. This scenario is shown in b).

How should I visualize this? Which bands are overlapping? Are these two valence bands overlapping? (As is the case in most semiconductors) Or is this the overlapping of a valence band and a conduction band - hence, is there no bandgap then? Is this the behaviour of a metal?

Many thanks already,

tsu
 

Attachments

  • fig2_3_7.gif
    fig2_3_7.gif
    3.4 KB · Views: 906
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is the valence band that overlaps the conducting band, of the entire solid of course. These "bands" are for the solid as a whole, not for individual atoms.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top