What is the size of the image of a tree on a man's retina?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anotherperson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eyes Lenses
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the size of the image of a 20.0m tree on a man's retina from a distance of 300m, the relevant optical principles and equations must be applied. The equation relating magnification (M) to object and image distances, as well as their respective heights, is crucial. The image distance (di) is determined to be 24.0mm, which corresponds to the length of the eye. The object distance (do) is 300m, and the object height (ho) is 20.0m. By using these values in the magnification formula, the height of the image (hi) can be calculated accurately.
anotherperson
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man looks at a tree of height 20.0m a distance of 300m away. the cornea has a radius of curvature of 7.7mm, eye has refractive index of 1.47 and the length of the eye is 24.0mm.

Calculate the size of the image of the tree on the man's retina.


Homework Equations


n1/p+n2/q=n2-n2/R


The Attempt at a Solution


i tired the following but i don't think it is correct
n1=1.47
n2=1.0
R=7.7
p=20

1.47/20+1.0/q=1.47-1.0/7.7
=0.06
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but i don't know the focal length...
 
You don't need it at all. I strongly suspect that at least 2 pieces of given information are extraneous, maybe more. Try this equation, relating magnification, M, to distances and height to the image and object.

M=-\frac{d_{i}}{d_{o}}=\frac{h_{i}}{h_{o}}
 
so if i use these values (changing the units of course) is this correct
di=7.7mm
do=300m
hi=24.0mm
ho=20.0m
and then using the magnification i get i can work out the size of the tree?
 
Well, since the image is formed on the back of the eye, di=24.0mm, the length of the eye. Remember that you are trying to solve for the height of the image, hi. This is your one unknown. Your do and ho look fine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top