What is the Slater determinant of a singlet or a triplet?

atat1tata
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
We have a system of 2 particles, let's say with following hamiltonian:

$$\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2\hat{\nabla}_1^2}{2m} -\frac{\hbar^2\hat{\nabla}_2^2}{2m} $$

The eigenstates are often represented as (spatial wavefunction)*(spin wavefunction), where the spin wavefunction is a singlet or a triplet. However the particle are independent. So the total wavefunction (position*spin) must be written as a Slater determinant of single-particle eigenstates. But I can't find such states!

For example, combining a(x)|\uparrow\rangle and b(x)|\downarrow\rangle I get a(x_1)b(x_2)|\uparrow\downarrow\rangle - b(x_1)a(x_2)|\downarrow\uparrow\rangle.

So how can I get the true eigenstates, namely (spatial part)*(spin part), where if one part is symmetric the other is antisymmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Singlet and triplet are degenerate when the particles are independent, so you could construct also two degenerate Slater deteminants from them.
 
You mean that the particles are identical and fermions of spin 1/2. Then the total state must be antisymmetric. Let's take momentum-spin eigenstates (which exist in non-relativistic quantum theory, because the spin operators commute with momentum). Then the two-particle basis can be given in terms of irreducible representations of the rotation group wrt. spin. The Kronecker product of two spin-1/2 representations reduce to spin 0 (singlet) und spin 1 (triplet). The former are the antisymmetrized and symmetrized product states, respectively:
$$|s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle - |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle,$$
$$|s=1,\sigma=1 \rangle=|s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle, \quad |s=1,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle +|s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle, \quad |s=1,\sigma=-1 \rangle=|s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle.$$
Further you can write the basis as a product of the momentum (orbital) part and the spin part. Since you have fermions, your basis in terms of proper total spin is
$$|\vec{p}_1,\vec{p}_2,s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|\vec{p}_1 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_2 \rangle + |\vec{p}_2 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_1 \rangle) \otimes |s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle,$$
$$|\vec{p}_1,\vec{p}_2,s=1 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|\vec{p}_1 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_2 \rangle -|\vec{p}_2 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_1 \rangle) \otimes |s=1,\sigma \rangle, \quad \sigma \in \{-1,0,1 \}.$$
 
vanhees71 said:
You mean that the particles are identical and fermions of spin 1/2. Then the total state must be antisymmetric. Let's take momentum-spin eigenstates (which exist in non-relativistic quantum theory, because the spin operators commute with momentum). Then the two-particle basis can be given in terms of irreducible representations of the rotation group wrt. spin. The Kronecker product of two spin-1/2 representations reduce to spin 0 (singlet) und spin 1 (triplet). The former are the antisymmetrized and symmetrized product states, respectively:
$$|s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle - |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle,$$
$$|s=1,\sigma=1 \rangle=|s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle, \quad |s=1,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle +|s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=1/2 \rangle, \quad |s=1,\sigma=-1 \rangle=|s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle \otimes |s=1/2,\sigma=-1/2 \rangle.$$
Further you can write the basis as a product of the momentum (orbital) part and the spin part. Since you have fermions, your basis in terms of proper total spin is
$$|\vec{p}_1,\vec{p}_2,s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|\vec{p}_1 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_2 \rangle + |\vec{p}_2 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_1 \rangle) \otimes |s=0,\sigma=0 \rangle,$$
$$|\vec{p}_1,\vec{p}_2,s=1 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|\vec{p}_1 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_2 \rangle -|\vec{p}_2 \rangle \otimes \vec{p}_1 \rangle) \otimes |s=1,\sigma \rangle, \quad \sigma \in \{-1,0,1 \}.$$
Thanks, but my question is if such a basis can be constructed by Slater determinants of single-particle spin-orbitals
 
Using a somewhat terser notation, each of the two possible slater determinants can be written as a 50-50 superposition of the singlet and triplet state (and vice versa):
abud-badu=((ab-ba)(ud+du)+(ab+ba)(ud-du))/2
abdu-baud=((ab-ba)(ud+du)-(ab+ba)(ud-du))/2

As these states are all degenerate, you may use either the Slater determinants or the spin eigenfunctions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top