What Is the Smallest Coefficient of Friction to Prevent Slippage Between Boxes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter legking
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the smallest coefficient of friction required to prevent slippage between a small box resting on a larger box. The participant correctly identifies the forces acting on the small box in their free body diagram, including gravity, normal force, and static friction. They derive the coefficient of static friction using the formula mu(S) = a/g, resulting in a value of 0.26 for an acceleration of 2.5 m/s². Clarifications are made regarding the terminology of applied force, emphasizing that it should not be included in the equations for the small box. Overall, the participant's approach and calculations are validated as correct.
legking
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Just as a bit of background: I'm taking a Grade 12 Uni prep correspondence course, and not only do the notebooks not explain the subjects NEARLY well enough, my teacher lives an hour away and I'd be lucky to see her once a week.

That being said, here's the question:

A small box is resting on a larger box, which in turn sits on a table. When a horizontal force is applied to the larger box, both boxes accelerate together. The small box does not slip on the larger box.

a) Draw a free body diagram of the small box as it accelerates.

b) What force causes the small box to accelerate?

c) If the acceleration of the pair of boxes has a magnitude of 2.5_{m/s^2}, determine the smallest coefficient of friction between the boxes that will prevent slippage.

My answers:

a) My FBD includes 3 forces: gravity (acting downwards on the box), normal force (acting opposite to gravity, perpendicular to the horizontal plane), and friction (acting in the same direction as the applied force on the larger box).

b) Friction, specifically static friction.

c)I'm not quite sure how to proceed from here. To prevent slippage, the force of static friction must be at least equal to the applied force. Therefore,

F(F)=F(A)
mu(S)F(N)=ma
mu(S)mg=ma
mu(S)=ma/mg
mu(S)=a/g
mu(S)=(2.5m/ss)/(9.8m/ss)
mu(S)=0.26

Does this look right? Sorry about the scripting - I'm learning Latex, but I can't tell how I'm using it from the "preview post" feature. I'm just wondering whether I can even include an applied force in the equation since it's being applied to the larger box, not the small box. Any help with this question, or any other questions I will undoubtedly have over the coming months, would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
legking said:
My answers:

a) My FBD includes 3 forces: gravity (acting downwards on the box), normal force (acting opposite to gravity, perpendicular to the horizontal plane), and friction (acting in the same direction as the applied force on the larger box).

b) Friction, specifically static friction.
Perfect.

c)I'm not quite sure how to proceed from here. To prevent slippage, the force of static friction must at least equal to the applied force. Therefore,

F(F)=F(A)
mu(S)F(N)=ma
mu(S)mg=ma
mu(S)=ma/mg
mu(S)=a/g
mu(S)=(2.5m/ss)/(9.8m/ss)
mu(S)=0.26
Careful with your terminology. You said "applied force", which might be taken to mean the force that was applied to the bottom box. But what you actually did was correct: You recognized that static friction was the net force and set that equal to "ma" per Newton's 2nd law (where "m" is the mass of the smaller box).

Another thing to be careful about. In general, static friction does not equal \mu N--\mu N is the maximum value of static friction. But, since you are trying to find the minimum value of \mu, you want to set static friction to its maximum value.

With that understanding, your answer is correct.

I'm just wondering whether I can even include an applied force in the equation since it's being applied to the larger box, not the small box.
Ah... now you're thinking. The applied force does not act on the small box, so you can't include it. (But you didn't really include it! :wink: ) Note that you--correctly--didn't list that applied force when you described your free body diagram for the smaller box.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top