What is the smallest Quantum of Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wawenspop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Quantum
wawenspop
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
I am wondering about the smallest bits of space time possible
and my musings lead me to the smallest quantum of energy.
Then I have a mental picture of the 'smallest' wave packet
possible as the building block of everything else.

For example, is the 'smallest' photon possible a
1 Hz photon? - (near absolute zero K?)
- then E = h*1 etc? Then I can start applying
Schrodinger and/or matrix math to find out more?

Or am I on the wrong track here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not aware of anything that says a photon cannot have a lower frequency than 1 Hz.

In QM, everything comes in chunks, but the variables defining those chunks (position, energy, momentum) are all still continuous.
 
The lowest possible frequency would be determined by the longest possible wavelength. This could be the diameter of the universe.
 
  • Like
Likes tomj
Could be but must it? The photon is always traveling at the speed of light, so a photon that starts at one edge of the universe would take 24 billion years or so to reach the other edge, at which point the universe will have expanded even more.

Moreover, the frequency is just the rate at which the EM fields mutually induce. The photon still only exists at one point in space at a time, and that point moves at c, so there's no reason that the oscillations couldn't be so slow that the photon doesn't even reach a full EM cycle from one end of the universe to another.

Now a different question is what is the largest packet of energy? Would it be a photon whose wavelength is the Planck Length?
 
According to wiki any photon that can probe the Planck length is likely to collapse into a black hole so I guess that places a fundamental limit on photons.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top