What is the Solution to the Overlapping Circles Number Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris
  • Start date Start date
Chris
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This is a problem which was given to my six-year-old cousin:
(you'll probably need a bit of paper)

Imagine three circles A, B and C in a straight line. A overlaps B and B overlaps C such that there are 5 distinct regions. You have to place the numbers 1-5, using each number only once, into the five regions, such that the total in each circle is the same. My cousin had to do this for 3 circles and 4 circles (i.e. 7 regions and numbers 1-7)

3 circles is easy... the regions would be 5 1 3 2 4
the total in each circle is six

4 circles is a bit harder and this is when my cousin's mum asked me (I don't think my cousin even understood the problem in the first place :eek: ). I got it pretty quickly with trial and error and a little bit of common sense:

7 3 2 5 1 4 6
the total in each circle is 10

So my cousin got his homework right. I suspect it was supposed to just practise their adding, but by now I was quite intruiged. I wondered whether there is a solution for all possible numbers of circles > 2. (2 circles has no solution, and 1 has a pretty obvious solution). By trial and error I worked out the total for 5 circles, which is 11:

9 2 5 4 6 1 7 3 8

By writing a rudimentary computer program, my friend worked out that the total for 6 circles was 14 (if I remember correctly), but I still cannot see a pattern. For 6 circles the numbers in the outermost regions are not the largest two numbers as they have been in the solutions above. None of the rest of my maths set (I'm seventeen, and doing maths/further maths), or my maths teacher, could find a pattern allowing us to predict the arrangement of numbers, or even the total, given the number of circles.

So:
Can it be proven that there is a solution for all numbers of circles > 2?
Can the arrangement and total in each circle be worked out given the number of circles?
Are there ever multiple solutions for a given number of circles (apart from the reflection)?

I, and my maths set, would be very grateful and interested by any insight anyone can provide.
Chris
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For 4 circles 7 2 6 1 3 5 4 is also a solution, with each circle totalling 9.
 
Well spotted chronon. Initially I hadn't considered solutions where the largest numbers aren't in the outermost circles, but that's clearly not the best approach.
That answers the question about multiple solutions!

Chris
 
Bumpety-bump
 
this is intriguing. i have putzed around a bit solving this with linear equations, but so far haven't had any success other than a small amount of info pertaining to which regions should equal other possible entries.

i am sure that a rudimentary course in combinatorics would shed a great deal of light on this problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
59
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top