What is the Speed v2 of the Mouse and the 0.25-kg Cart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Angela_vaal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a 0.038-kg mouse jumping from a 0.35-kg cart to a 0.25-kg cart, with the initial state being at rest. Participants debate whether the collision is elastic or inelastic, concluding that the mouse's jump involves two inelastic collisions: one with the first cart and another with the second cart, where it sticks. The conservation of momentum is identified as the relevant principle to solve the problem, as there are no external forces acting on the system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of not assuming collisions are elastic without justification and encourages using conservation laws effectively. The scenario illustrates the application of conservation principles in a frictionless environment.
Angela_vaal
Messages
59
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 0.038-kg pet lab mouse sits on a 0.35-kg air-track cart, as shown in (Figure 1) . The cart is at rest, as is a second cart with a mass of 0.25 kg. The lab mouse now jumps to the second cart. After the jump, the 0.35-kg cart has a speed of v1=0.86m/s.

What is the speed v2 of the mouse and the 0.25-kg cart?
fig_9-27.png


Homework Equations


1/2m1v02=1/2m1v1,f2+1/2m2v2,f2

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to start. I am assuming this is an elastic collision since the carts don't stick together after the collision. Would I use the equation listed above? I just don't know how to start
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if 'not sticking together' ensures an elastic collision ...

And if the speeds beforehand were zero, then afterwards they must be zero too ?
Do you think there is conservation of kinetic energy in this case ?
What about the work mickey mouse does when kicking away the 0.35 kg block ?

Know any other conservation laws ? (in fact, one other is already enough...:smile: )
 
The mouse "sticks" to the second cart, so at least part of the scenario involves a collision that is not an elastic one.

What conservation law does your relevant equation express? Is there another quantity that's conserved that might be a better choice for the overall scenario?Edit: Ah! BvU got there before me!
 
gneill said:
The mouse "sticks" to the second cart, so at least part of the scenario involves a collision that is not an elastic one.

What conservation law does your relevant equation express? Is there another quantity that's conserved that might be a better choice for the overall scenario?Edit: Ah! BvU got there before me!

Is the collision inelastic then?
 
I'm confused.
 
Angela_vaal said:
Is the collision inelastic then?
It's not a single collision scenario. The mouse pushes off the first cart with what might be interpreted as an inelastic collision in reverse (separation instead of joining) and then collides with and sticks to the second cart in another inelastic collision.

The good news is that one conservation law covers the whole process from start to finish.
 
And what is this conservation law?
 
Angela_vaal said:
Is the collision inelastic then?
You should never assume collisions are elastic without good reason. If you can solve without that assumption, do so.
As others have told you, there is another conservation law available. You must have been taught it. It applies to a system (two carts plus mouse in this case) provided there are no external forces acting on the system in the direction of interest. Since the track is frictionless, there are no external horizontal forces on that system, so the law applies in that direction.
 
Back
Top