What is the Study of Chemical Transformation through Organic Lifeforms Called?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LifeLongLearner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine Organic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the process of converting raw chemicals into desired products using organic lifeforms, specifically focusing on yeast for alcohol production. It highlights two main approaches: genetic modification of the organisms and environmental manipulation to influence their output. The conversation identifies relevant fields such as biotechnology, fermentation science, microbiology, biochemical engineering, and molecular biology, noting that these disciplines often overlap. The use of bioreactors for manipulating the growth conditions of microorganisms is also mentioned. The complexity of categorizing scientific disciplines is acknowledged, emphasizing that distinctions are increasingly blurred in modern research. The discussion suggests that resources on recombinant DNA techniques may provide further insights into these processes.
LifeLongLearner
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is probably a really easy question, but I need help in finding the answers to it. Let's say I have a some raw chemical A (example: water) and I want to make it into a chemical B (example: something with an -OH). However, I don't want to use any chemical means but do everything via an organic lifeforms (example: yeast).

Let's say I also want this lifeforms to also be able to create different types of alcohols. One way seems to be to genetically modify the life form while the other method is to change the environment that life form is in so that it leans towards the chemical I want made.

What is this study called? Is there a specific branch of it or is a mis-mash of Biology, Chemistry, Engineering, Biochemistry, Genetics? Is there a single book somewhere which might explain how this is done?

Thanks
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Could fall under the Biotechnology umbrella
 
Fermentation science?
 
Probably wouldn't have much versatility with such an approach - "lifeforms" are pretty specific - and usually genetic engineering manipulates what the organism naturally produces and not actually change the organism.
 
When dealing with something such as yeast, microbiology would be the field. When dealing with ways to force microorganisms (not necessarily yeast to produce alcohol, but generically any microorganism and any chemical product) to produce chemical substances of interest (such as for mass production of pharmaceuticals for commercial reasons), you're talking about biochemical engineering (sort of a melding of chemical engineering and biochemistry or microbiology or genetic engineering). The thing you'd be using to manipulate the environment of the organisms you'll use for such production would be considered a bioreactor.

And, if you had additional questions to ask about the processes involved here, depending on the question you had in mind, either the Biology forum or Materials & Chemical Engineering forum would potentially be suitable (in addition to possibly some questions here in Chemistry).
 
At this stage, trying to categorize certain aspects of science under specific fields is disingenuous because the distinctions are so vague and cross disciplinary. What you described is achieved through methods of recombinant DNA, much like how mass production of growth hormone achieved economic feasibility. Recombinant DNA is a technique taught under the hospices of molecular biology but the applications extend to biotechnology, biochemistry, bioengineering, and systems biology. Clear cut distinctions don't really work anymore.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top