What is the Submerged Volume of a Styrofoam Cube in Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mackanator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Submerged
AI Thread Summary
To determine the submerged volume of a 10g styrofoam cube in water, it's essential to understand that it must displace an equivalent weight of water. Given that the density of water is 1g/cm³, the cube needs to displace 10cm³ of water to float. With a base area of 100cm², the height of the submerged portion is calculated to be 1mm. This confirms that the styrofoam cube will indeed be submerged by 1mm in water. The discussion highlights the application of Archimedes' principle in practical scenarios.
Mackanator
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find how much of a cube of styrofoam is submerged in water without measuring because the amount is very small.

Capture.JPG


If I have a block of styrofoam with a mass of 10g and a density of 0.018g/cm3
How much of the styrofoam will be submerged?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MY guess would be 1mm, 10g of water has a volume of 10cm^3, so the same volume of styrofoam to displace same volume of water would be .1cm *10 cm * 10cm
 
I'm a little bit confused. Can you explain that again more thoroughly?
 
Any floating object displaces its own weight of fluid.

— Archimedes of Syracuse[3]

So the weight of the styrofoam is 10g, to float, it must displace 10g of water

The density of water is 1g/cm^3 so 10g of water has a volume of 10cm^3. That is the volume of water to be displaced by an equal volume of styrofoam, since the block has a 100cm^2 bottom, it will take a height of 1mm to reach the desired volume.
 
Wow, simple. thanks!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top