What is the Temperature of the Low Temperature Reservoir in a Carnot Engine?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the temperature of the low temperature reservoir (TLo) in a Carnot engine with a high temperature reservoir (THi) of 100K and a power output of 5W. The efficiency equation for a Carnot engine, e = 1 - TLo/THi, is highlighted as a key formula, but participants express confusion about how to proceed with the calculations. There is acknowledgment that multiple combinations of TLo and heat input (Q1) can yield the required work output, emphasizing the need for a sufficient temperature difference to enable gas expansion. The low high temperature of 100K raises concerns about the feasibility of the engine's operation. Overall, the conversation reflects a struggle to connect theoretical efficiency with practical application in this context.
JoeSmith1013
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Carnot engine moves a piston which applies 5N of force to a rotating disc by moving a piston 0.25cm for
a total of 5W of power. If the high temperature reservoir is 100K, what must the temperature of the low
temperature reservoir be?

Homework Equations


The efficiency of a Carnot engine is given by the formula
e = 1-TLo/THi.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know you can rearrange the efficiency equation and solve for Tlo which is TLo = (1-e)*THi. After this this step I am drawing a blank on what to do next. I know that it gives you the work done by the piston and the power of the engine, but I don't know what to do next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know anything about the carnot cycle besides the efficiency equation?
 
Hmm - is there a solution?
The work per carnot cycle is presumably 5N x 0.0025m = 0.0125J.
There are an infinite number of combinations of T2 and Q1 that can provide this work (T2 = low temp, Q1 = high heat) while still satisfying carnot efficiency.
The power of 5W just indicates how many carnot cycles have to be performed per second.
Comments/critiques welcome!
 
Rude man/JoeSmith1013, I feel your pain on this one. To let you know where I'm at on this one, I even had to search to find out what a carnot engine was. Maybe the efficiency equation has nothing to do with it. Maybe it has to do with the fact that the gas temperature has to be reduced enough so that when it is warmed up, the gas expansion is sufficient to produce the 5N and 0.25cm. It is possible for a situation where the temperature difference is so small that the gas expansion cannot even produce the 5 N, 0.25 cm movement. So it seems to me that there has to be some minimum temperature delta to accomplish that. Just my $0.02.
 
TomHart said:
Rude man/JoeSmith1013, I feel your pain on this one. To let you know where I'm at on this one, I even had to search to find out what a carnot engine was. Maybe the efficiency equation has nothing to do with it. Maybe it has to do with the fact that the gas temperature has to be reduced enough so that when it is warmed up, the gas expansion is sufficient to produce the 5N and 0.25cm. It is possible for a situation where the temperature difference is so small that the gas expansion cannot even produce the 5 N, 0.25 cm movement. So it seems to me that there has to be some minimum temperature delta to accomplish that. Just my $0.02.
There is always some minimum temperature delta required in any engine.
I did notice that the "high" temperature is pretty da**ed low (almost to frozen Nitrogen) which seems odd but I guess there it is.
Th efficiency of a carnot engine is determined by the fact that the entropy loss of the "high" reservoir = entropy gained by the low (lower!) reservoir. The possible combinations of Q1 and T2 I referred to previously is based on this fact.
 
I think there is context missing.
Its pretty specific about how the carnot cycles is being implimented so there may be an example in course notes that can help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top