What is the thickness of the spacer?

AI Thread Summary
The thickness of the spacer between two glass plates can be calculated using the formula T = m(1/2 wavelength), where m represents the number of dark fringes observed. In this case, five dark fringes are noted, leading to confusion about whether m should be 4 or 5. The correct interpretation is that the answer is 4, as the question specifies "from edge to edge," indicating the number of fringes between the plates rather than the total. Thus, the thickness of the spacer is calculated as 4 x 589 nm / 2, resulting in 1178 nm. Understanding the context of the question is crucial for determining the correct value of m.
jazzchan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

the question is ...
Two flat glass plates touch at one edge and are separated at the other edge by a spacer. Using vertical viewing and light is 589 nm(wavelength), five dark fringes(D) are obtained from edge to edge. What is the thickness of the spacer ??

i know that the thinkness of space(T) = m(1/2wavelength), but
would u mind to give me some idea for what is the m ?? is 4 or 5 ??

I think it is 5...but i checked the correct answer is 4 ?? why ?? because of 'from edge to edge' ??

best regards and thanks

JazzChan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is 4 because the fringes you are seeing are interference fringes. This means that light from one edge is interfering with light from the other edge, producing constructive and destructive interference. This only happens when the path difference between the two light sources is an integral number of wavelengths. So, the path difference between the two edges must be 4x589nm in order for the fringes to line up. Therefore, the thickness of the spacer must be 4x589nm/2 = 1178nm.
 


Hello JazzChan,

Thank you for your question regarding the interference of light. The value of "m" in the equation T = m(1/2wavelength) represents the number of dark fringes observed between the two plates. In this case, since five dark fringes are observed from edge to edge, the value of m would be 5. However, it is important to note that the equation T = m(1/2wavelength) is only applicable when the light is incident perpendicular to the plates. If the light is at an angle, the value of m may differ.

As for the discrepancy in the answer, it could be due to the wording in the question. Since the question states "from edge to edge," it is possible that the answer is asking for the number of dark fringes observed between the two plates, rather than the total number of dark fringes. In this case, the correct answer would be 4.

I hope this explanation helps clarify any confusion. Best of luck with your studies!


 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top