What is the torque needed to lift a weight with a lever?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque required to lift a weight using a lever. The initial calculations suggest a torque of 360 Nm is needed, leading to a force of 300 N, but the correct answer is identified as 150 N. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding mechanical advantage and the relationship between the lever and disk torques. Clarifications are made regarding the calculation of torque, particularly the significance of the distances involved and the role of the string in exerting torque. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for accurate application of torque principles in lever mechanics.
Priyadarshini
Messages
191
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


upload_2015-12-27_19-50-1.png


Homework Equations


Torque=one of the forces x the perpendicular distance
moment=force x perpendicular distance

The Attempt at a Solution


moment of pulling the weight up around the disc:
1.2/2 = 0.6 m
0.6-0.2 = 0.4 m
moment= 0.4 x 900 = 360 Nm
To lift it, the torque of the rod has to be 360 Nm too
So,
F x 1.2 = 360
F = 300 N

But the answer is 150N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Priyadarshini said:
But the answer is 150N
Hi Priyadarshini:

Your description of your solution omits some details, so I am not sure where you went astray. I suggest thinking about the problem in terms of mechanical advantage.
What is the mechanical advantage of the 2F force (1F on each end of the lever) applied at its radius compared with the 900N force applies at the radius if the disc?

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi Priyadarshini:

Your description of your solution omits some details, so I am not sure where you went astray. I suggest thinking about the problem in terms of mechanical advantage.
What is the mechanical advantage of the 2F force (1F on each end of the lever) applied at its radius compared with the 900N force applies at the radius if the disc?

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
Hi,
What exactly do you mean by mechanical advantage?
 
Try calculating the torque on the vertical shaft due to the 900N force. The two forces F must create a torque at least as great.
 
Hi, finding the minimum force is the same as saying that the torque of the disk has the same magnitude of the torque of the lever

T (lever) = F*d where d= 1.20 m
T (disk)= W*R where R is the radius of the disk and W is the weight

T (lever)= T (disk)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Priyadarshini said:
0.6-0.2 = 0.4 m
This does not calculate anything useful. What physical law are you planning to use this in?
It's the ratio of the two distances that's interesting, not the difference.
 
CWatters said:
Try calculating the torque on the vertical shaft due to the 900N force. The two forces F must create a torque at least as great.
Isn't that 0.4*900?
 
Cozma Alex said:
Hi, finding the minimum force is the same as saying that the torque of the disk has the same magnitude of the torque of the lever

T (lever) = F*d where d= 1.20 m
T (disk)= W*R where R is the radius of the disk and W is the weight

T (lever)= T (disk)
why do we take the radius of the disc instead of half the rod minus the radius of the disc? Isn't the turning point on the circumference of the disc where the string starts to rotate around the disc?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
This does not calculate anything useful. What physical law are you planning to use this in?
It's the ratio of the two distances that's interesting, not the difference.
I thought that 0.4 was the perpendicular distance from the pivot for calculating the torque of the disc, which is why I subtracted.
 
  • #11
Priyadarshini said:
why do we take the radius of the disc instead of half the rod minus the radius of the disc? Isn't the turning point on the circumference of the disc where the string starts to rotate around the disc?
No, both rod and disc rotate about an axis through their centres.
I suppose you could consider that the not-yet-wound string instantaneously rotates about the point of contact with the disc, but since it exerts no torque about that point it is quite irrelevant.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
No, both rod and disc rotate about an axis through their centres.
I suppose you could consider that the not-yet-wound string instantaneously rotates about the point of contact with the disc, but since it exerts no torque about that point it is quite irrelevant.
How do you know that the string at the contact point of the disc doesn't exert any torque?
 
  • #14
Priyadarshini said:
How do you know that the string at the contact point of the disc doesn't exert any torque?
I meant its rotation about the contact point exerts no torque. It is a flexible string, not a rigid lever. Only the tension in the string exerts a torque, but that has no moment about the contact point: torque = force x perpendicular distance, and the distance from the string to the contact point is zero.
The torque of interest exerted by the tension is at the disc's axis.
 
  • #15
The string exerts a torque at the contact point of the disk (F*R), the torque is because of the 900 N force, to balance this torque you need the torque of the lever that is needed to be minimum equal to the torque at the disk
 
  • #16
Cozma Alex said:
The string exerts a torque at the contact point of the disk, the torque is because of the 900 N force, to balance this torque you need the torque of the lever that is needed to be minimum equal to the torque at the disk

haruspex said:
I meant its rotation about the contact point exerts no torque. It is a flexible string, not a rigid lever. Only the tension in the string exerts a torque, but that has no moment about the contact point: torque = force x perpendicular distance, and the distance from the string to the contact point is zero.
The torque of interest exerted by the tension is at the disc's axis.
Oh, I see! Thank you. It works now.
 
  • #17
Priyadarshini said:
Isn't that 0.4*900?

0.2 * 900
 
  • #18
CWatters said:
0.2 * 900
Thanks.
 
Back
Top