What is the total charge on the surface?

blueyellow

Homework Statement


A point charge q is embedded at the centre of a sphere of linear dielectric material (with susceptibility chi(subscript e) and radius R).

b)What is the total charge on the surface? [3 marks]
c) where is the compensating negative bound charge located? calculate it


The Attempt at a Solution



volume polarisation charge density=-div P
=1/r^2 d/dr((r^2)P) (partial derivative)
=1/r^2 d/dr [[(r^2 Q chi(e) epsilon0]/[4 pi epsilon(r) r^2]]
=1/R^2 d/dr [(q chi(e) epsilon0)/(4 pi epsilon (r))]
=1/R^2 *0
=0


surface charge polarisation density=[(q chi(e) epsilon0) r-hat.n]/(4 pi epsilon1 R^2)
=[(q chi(e) epsilon0)]/(4 pi epsilon1 R^2)

does that help to calculate the total bound charge on the surface at all?
because the surface polarisation charge density=0, the bound charge on the surface=0. three marks for saying just that?

please tell me if I'm wrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
, I'm not confident about this. c) The compensating charge is located in the interior of the sphere i.e. at the position of the point charge q.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top