What is the total distance traveled by a bullet fragment after an explosion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riman643
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total distance traveled by a bullet fragment after an explosion. The initial velocity components of the bullet are determined, with the vertical component leading to a calculated apex height of 18.15 meters. After the explosion, the horizontal velocity of one fragment is found to be 44 m/s, while the other falls vertically. The total distance traveled by the fragment is initially calculated as 107.23 meters, but there are corrections suggested regarding the momentum calculations and the need to use symbolic methods. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding projectile motion and momentum conservation in solving such problems efficiently.
Riman643
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A shell is shot with an initial velocity Vo of 22 m/s, at an angle of θ = 59° with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass (see the figure). One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?
Relevant Equations
Basic kinematics
p = mv
Okay so the first thing I did was was find the height of the apex. I found this by finding the x and y components of Vo:
Vox = VoCos(θ) = 22cos(59) = 11.33 m/s
Voy = VoSin(θ) = 22sin(59) = 18.86 m/s

Using the initial velocity of the y component I found the time it took to reach the apex:
t = -Voy / ay = -18.86/-9.8 = 1.93 s

Using the time I found the height of the apex:
Δy = Voyt + (1/2)ayt^2 = 18.86(1.93) + (1/2)(-9.8)(1.93^2) = 18.15 m

Using the height I found the time it took after the explosion for the bullet fragment to reach the ground. Because the bullet was at the apex, the initial velocity of the fragments is zero in the y direction
t = √(Δy/(1/2ay)) = √[(-18.15)/((1/2)(-9.8))] = 1.94s

Using the momentum equation I was able to find the initial velocity of the bullet fragment in the x direction:
Pi = Pf; 22m = (1/2)mVo; Vo = 44

Finally using the two times and two speeds of the fragment in the x direction I found (wrong according to the website) the total distance:
Δx = (Vox * t) + (Vox * t) = (11.33)(1.93) + (44)(1.94) = 107.23 m
 

Attachments

  • fig09_46new.gif
    fig09_46new.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 300
Physics news on Phys.org
Riman643 said:
Problem Statement: A shell is shot with an initial velocity Vo of 22 m/s, at an angle of θ = 59° with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass (see the figure). One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?
Relevant Equations: Basic kinematics
p = mv

Using the momentum equation I was able to find the initial velocity of the bullet fragment in the x direction:
Pi = Pf; 22m = (1/2)mVo; Vo = 44
What is the initial velocity in the x-direction?
 
Before the collision the initial velocity is 11.33 m/s. Then treating the explosion as a separate event, I made the initial velocity in the x direction of the gun fragment 44 m/s.
 
Riman643 said:
Before the collision the initial velocity is 11.33 m/s. Then treating the explosion as a separate event, I made the initial velocity in the x direction of the gun fragment 44 m/s.
How did the horizontal velocity increase during the ascent to 22m/s?
 
haruspex said:
How did the horizontal velocity increase during the ascent to 22m/s?
It did not increase during the ascent. It increased when the bullet reached the apex because of the explosion.
 
Riman643 said:
It did not increase during the ascent. It increased when the bullet reached the apex because of the explosion.
How do you figure that it went from 11.33 m/s to 44 m/s? Were not the two fragments of the same mass?
 
gneill said:
How do you figure that it went from 11.33 m/s to 44 m/s? Were not the two fragments of the same mass?
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
 
Riman643 said:
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
Yes. Check your units for pi (see highlighted text in the quote). Momentum does not have units of only length.
 
Riman643 said:
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
Yes.
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.

You did not need to calculate the descent time. In the absence of drag, it must be the same as the ascent.

The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE
  • #10
gneill said:
Yes. Check your units for pi (see highlighted text in the quote). Momentum does not have units of only length.
The 11.33 is m/s. The m represents the mass in the momentum equation. Sorry for the confusion.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Yes.
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.

You did not need to calculate the descent time. In the absence of drag, it must be the same as the ascent.

The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
Yeah, I've been given that advice before. I'm new to physics so I'm just trying to solve the problems the way I know how at the moment.
 
  • #12
Riman643 said:
The 11.33 is m/s. The m represents the mass in the momentum equation. Sorry for the confusion.
Okay. I was confused because mixing numbers without units with variables that have implied units is somewhat confusing. I highly recommend @haruspex 's suggestion regarding doing the work symbolically until the very end.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
A small addendum to that: This works only (as is the case here) if the CM follows the projectile's original trajectory. The fragments must land simultaneously, which is the case if their vertical velocity is zero immediately after the explosion.
gneill said:
I highly recommend @haruspex 's suggestion regarding doing the work symbolically until the very end.
Amen to that.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.
Me too.
 
Back
Top