What is the true statement about Carnot engine efficiency?

newyork
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following statements about a Carnot engine is true?
a) Any Carnot engine has an efficiency of 100%
b) Irreversible energies have the greatest possible efficiency.
c) Heat can spontaneously flow from a cold reservoir to a hotter reservoir.
d) If a process is reversible, the efficiency of an engine is maximum.
e) All energies are reversible.


Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I think the answer is E. I canceled out choice b because no where in my textbook did it mention irreversible energies having high efficiency. I don't think it's choice a because the third law of thermodynamics says reaching a temperature of absolute zero is impossible and makes it impossible for a Carnot cycle engine to achieve 100% efficiency. So if I'm right, why is E right? If I'm wrong, then why would it be one of the other choices? I pretty much just used process of elimination.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i suggest you to check much better the differences beetween rev and irrev process.
regards
 
Marco_84 said:
i suggest you to check much better the differences beetween rev and irrev process.
regards

i've got a better idea. research what a carnot engine is. it's a lot faster than checking the differences between rev and irrev processes. it will actually help you solve the question
 
i think the answer is that all engines are reversible. the one that states that "if a process is reversible, the efficiency of an engine is maximum" wouldn't be accurate because ALL processes have to be reversible to obtain maximum efficiency, not just one.
 
I would say d is the correct answer here, a is completely false due to the second law of thermodynamcs(never can all heat be converted into pure work),b is obviously not true, c would not have a positive entropy change andhence does not occur spontaneously, e doesn't make sense...hence my choice d, however the statements are rather ambiguous
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top