What is the uncertainty principle for Standard Model particles?

Ruslan_Sharipov
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
Hello Folks!
Though I have written my own paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0605709) , I am still a novice in Standard Model. Therefore, I have some questions for experts.

The modules squares of the fermion wave functions are interpreted as the probability densities for the particles to be at some specific place. Is the same true for
- massive vector bosons?
- massless vector bosons (e.g. photons)?
- Higgs boson?
If the answer is negative in some of the above cases, what is the uncertainty principle for such particles?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ruslan_Sharipov said:
Hello Folks!
Though I have written my own paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/math.DG/0605709) , I am still a novice in Standard Model. Therefore, I have some questions for experts.

The modules squares of the fermion wave functions are interpreted as the probability densities for the particles to be at some specific place. Is the same true for
- massive vector bosons?
- massless vector bosons (e.g. photons)?
- Higgs boson?
If the answer is negative in some of the above cases, what is the uncertainty principle for such particles?
Yes, in all cases.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Does the New Muon g-2 Measurement Indicate Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
Replies
2
Views
2K
A What is the problem with the particle masses in the Standard Model?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I New Constraints On The Higgs Boson Width
Replies
11
Views
3K
A Furey's superalgebra and the standard model
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Why is the Higgs boson considered a boson?
Replies
9
Views
2K
In the standard model gravitron is a particle but Higgs boson is not?
Replies
18
Views
4K
I New muon g-2 calculation consistent with experiment
Replies
0
Views
3K
Do all exchange bosons violate energy conservation?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Progress In Calculating The HLbL Contribution To Muon g-2
Replies
0
Views
2K
Gravity and massless particles
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top