What Is the V-Hat Object in RC Circuit Filtering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the V-hat object in an RC circuit filtering context, as presented in a biophysics book by Koch. The participant struggles with understanding the mathematical notation and the origin of the 2pi*i term, which relates to the Fourier Transform. They note that V-hat is not defined in the text or its appendix, suggesting it may be a notation borrowed from physics. A helpful link is shared that clarifies some concepts, and another resource is mentioned that uses the Laplace transform to explain similar ideas. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions and connections in technical texts.
NeuroRYoung
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I bought a biophysics book the other day, and immediately began reading it. Sadly, I'm only 12 pages in now, because I seem to have run up against a wall in my understanding. You see, I don't understand a step being taken in the math, and am not sure what I should learn to understand it better.

image of paragraph.

Specifically, what loses me is the V-hat object - no idea what that is. And furthermore, I don't know where the 2pi*i term comes from. I know the bare basics of Fourier Transform, but I think there's something missing. And Koch doesn't define the V-hat object. (I'm life sciences, please forgive my ignorance.)

Any tips would be majorly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does Koch define things in Appendix B?
 
Ya, I read Appendix B. It doesn't seem to go into the matter. Or at least if it does, I can't see the connection.

Appendix B
pg.1 .... http://imgur.com/mZCodBh
pg.2 .... http://imgur.com/OtEQ7J6
pg.3 .... http://imgur.com/TVA7EV1

Moreover, V-hat never showed up before that paragraph. Nor is it in the symbol table in the beginning of the book. I must be missing something - Koch is a physicist; I'm guessing it's something imported the hat notation from his field?
 
Last edited:
@atyy Super! Thanks for the helpful link. Clarifies at least some of what's going on.
 
This may also be helpful. It uses the Laplace transform, instead of the Fourier transform, to solve an RC circuit, but the ideas are the same, since the Laplace and Fourier transforms are similar.
http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/ee102/laplace.pdf
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top