What Is the V-Hat Object in RC Circuit Filtering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the V-hat object in an RC circuit filtering context, as presented in a biophysics book by Koch. The participant struggles with understanding the mathematical notation and the origin of the 2pi*i term, which relates to the Fourier Transform. They note that V-hat is not defined in the text or its appendix, suggesting it may be a notation borrowed from physics. A helpful link is shared that clarifies some concepts, and another resource is mentioned that uses the Laplace transform to explain similar ideas. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions and connections in technical texts.
NeuroRYoung
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I bought a biophysics book the other day, and immediately began reading it. Sadly, I'm only 12 pages in now, because I seem to have run up against a wall in my understanding. You see, I don't understand a step being taken in the math, and am not sure what I should learn to understand it better.

image of paragraph.

Specifically, what loses me is the V-hat object - no idea what that is. And furthermore, I don't know where the 2pi*i term comes from. I know the bare basics of Fourier Transform, but I think there's something missing. And Koch doesn't define the V-hat object. (I'm life sciences, please forgive my ignorance.)

Any tips would be majorly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does Koch define things in Appendix B?
 
Ya, I read Appendix B. It doesn't seem to go into the matter. Or at least if it does, I can't see the connection.

Appendix B
pg.1 .... http://imgur.com/mZCodBh
pg.2 .... http://imgur.com/OtEQ7J6
pg.3 .... http://imgur.com/TVA7EV1

Moreover, V-hat never showed up before that paragraph. Nor is it in the symbol table in the beginning of the book. I must be missing something - Koch is a physicist; I'm guessing it's something imported the hat notation from his field?
 
Last edited:
@atyy Super! Thanks for the helpful link. Clarifies at least some of what's going on.
 
This may also be helpful. It uses the Laplace transform, instead of the Fourier transform, to solve an RC circuit, but the ideas are the same, since the Laplace and Fourier transforms are similar.
http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/ee102/laplace.pdf
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top