What is the Variational Principle for Estimating Energy of First Excited State?

bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in a potential of V(x) = Kx4 and the wave function is given as ψ(x)= e^-(ax2) use the variational principle to estimate the ground state energy.

Part B:
The true ground state energy wave function for this potential is a symmetric function of x i.e. ψ0(x)=ψ0(-x). Use the result that <ψ0lψ(β)> = 0 along with an approximately chosen wave function, to estimate the energy of the first excited state.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I know how to compute variational method approximations and I have proven the identity <ψ0lψ(β)> = 0 earlier on my assignment and understand the identity as well. What I don't understand is the part that says "Use the result that <ψ0lψ(β)> = 0 along with an approximately chosen wave function, to estimate the energy of the first excited state."

Again I know that when <ψ0lψ(β)> = 0 the variational principle becomes E1≤ <ψlHlψ>/<ψlψ> but does the problem want me to chose a different wavefunction? And if so how to I go about choosing this new wave-function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is to pick a wavefunction which is orthogonal to your first
and use that as a trial to read the first excited energy [again variationally].
The clue is telling you to look at the parity, an even wf. is orthogonal to an odd wf,
so your trial function should be chosen odd.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top