What is the vector equation for escape velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a vector equation for escape velocity, which is defined as v=sqrt(2GM/r). One participant suggests that the vector form can be expressed as v=(sqrt(2GM)/r)hat{r}, noting that escape velocity is more accurately termed "escape speed" since it is a scalar quantity. The challenge arises in determining the correct direction for escape velocity, which can vary based on the distance from the gravitational body and its radius. It is emphasized that any trajectory that does not intersect the surface of the body is valid for escape, with fewer options available when starting directly above the surface. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in programming for three-body gravitational problems.
rich86
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hi, i have been looking for a while but stillnot managed to find a vector equation for the Escape Velocity. i know the escape velocity is:

v=sqrt(2GM/r)

i would like a vector form to extend a program i am making for a three body gravitational problem

many thanks

richard
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Would it not just be \bold{v}=\frac{\sqrt{2GM}}{r}\hat{r}?
 
The term "escape velocity" is a bit of a misnomer: it really should be called "escape speed" because it truly is a scalar quantity.
 
thanks, that helps a lot...

..but makes my project harder in finding the right direction for the escape velocity!
 
rich86 said:
thanks, that helps a lot...

..but makes my project harder in finding the right direction for the escape velocity!

The right direction is any direction, as long as the resulting trajectory doesn't intersect the surface of the body you are trying to escape from. Whether any given trajectory intersects the surface depends a couple of factors, The distance you are from center of the body and the radius of the body. If you are sitting right above the surface of the body you have a smaller range of possible directions that do not result in collision with the surface than you would if you started some greater distance away from the body.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top