What is the Velocity and Acceleration of a Transverse Wave on a Stretched Cord?

Eternal Sky
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The left-hand end of a long horizontal stretched cord oscillates transversely in SHM with frequency f = 250 Hz and amplitude 2.6 cm. The cord is under a tension of 140 N and has a linear density \mu = 0.12 kg/m. At t = 0, the end of the cord has an upward displacement 1.6 cm and is falling. What is the velocity and acceleration at t = 2.0 seconds at a point on the string that is 1.00 m from the left-hand end?



Homework Equations


v_{y} = -D_{M} \omega \cos (kx - \omega t)

v = \sqrt{\frac{F_{T}}{\mu}}

v = \lambda f



The Attempt at a Solution


I determined the wave velocity using the equation,
v = \sqrt{\frac{F_{T}}{\mu}} = \sqrt{\frac{140 N}{.12 kg/m}} = 34 m/s

I used this to find the wavelength \lambda,

\lambda = \frac{v}{f} = \frac{34 m/s}{250 Hz} = 0.14 m

So, in the equation for the velocity of the particle,

k = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} = 45/m

\omega = 2\pi f = 1570/s

Therefore, the equation for the particle velocity should be,

v = -(0.026 m)(1570/s)\cos[(45/m)(1.00 m) - (1570/s)(2.0 s)]
v = 35 m/s

However, the book says that the answer is 41 m/s. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eternal Sky said:

Homework Equations


v_{y} = -D_{M} \omega \cos (kx - \omega t)

Since initially, at x=0, the displacement is neither zero nor at a maximum, this equation should be modified to include a phase, i.e.

cos(kx - ωt + φ)

Use the initial displacement and velocity at x=0 to determine φ.

Looks like you have the right idea otherwise.
 
Yes, adding the phase angle made everything work out correctly.

Thanks for your help!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top