What is the W- boson in beta decay?

JJ
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
neutron => proton + W- => proton + electron + electron anti-neutrino

What're the quarks composing W-? To convert a neutron to a proton, there would need to be the expulsion of a down anti-up pair. That would mean a tad bit of mass loss, how does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JJ said:
neutron => proton + W- => proton + electron + electron anti-neutrino

What're the quarks composing W-? To convert a neutron to a proton, there would need to be the expulsion of a down anti-up pair. That would mean a tad bit of mass loss, how does this work?

A d quark in the neutron emits the W- and becomes a u quark., but there are no quarks in the W. The W is called a gauge boson, and it mediates electroweak interactions between leptons. It's a distinct type of particle from a quark (which is a lepton).

The photon is another example of such a boson, as are the Z, gluon, and graviton (if it exists).
 
So it isn't a meson (edit: wait, stupid question as it doesn't have quarks)? By mediating the electroweak interaction, do you mean it is emitted from the neutron and then splits into an electron and antineutrino? Is it as simple as that or more complicated? If it is complicated, don't bother yourself with explaining it here.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
It is as simple as that. In any case you can consider that the W is very massive, thus the emission violates energy preservation and thus it must decay in a very short time, inverse of the mass or so, to meet Heisenberg principle.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top