What is the Wavelength of Emitted Photon in a Cosmological Redshift Scenario?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a cosmological redshift scenario involving the emission and observation of photons in an expanding universe. The problem specifically addresses the relationship between emitted and observed wavelengths of a photon, particularly in the context of a hydrogen atom and the scale factor of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the mathematical relationships governing the emission and observation of wavelengths, referencing equations related to the scale factor and Hubble's law. There is an attempt to clarify the distinction between observed wavelengths at different cosmic times.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equations and relationships needed to approach the problem, while others are seeking clarification on specific aspects of the scenario, particularly regarding the assumptions made in part (d) and the interpretation of wavelengths.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the assumption that the universe described in part (b) continues to apply in part (d). Participants are also navigating the implications of the problem's setup, including the role of the hydrogen atom in the observation process.

Joella Kait
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a point in the intergalactic medium at some cosmic time ## t_{obs}##, the time of arrival of a photon of wavelength ##λ_{obs}## as seen by a hydrogen atom at that location. The source of this photon a comoving distance ##r## away emitted it at wavelength ##λ_{em}## at time ##t_{em}##. Assume the scale factor at present ##a_0= 1##.

(a) Express ##r## as a function of ##t_{obs}##, ##t_{em}## and the scale factor ##a(t)##.

(b) Solve for the dependence of ##a(t)## on ##t## for a universe in which the Hubble constant varies with time according to
\ H(t)=\frac{2}{3t}.

(c) What is the ratio of ##λ_{em}## to ##λ_{obs}## in terms of ##t_{em}## and ##t_{obs}##, in a universe described in (b)?

(d) The same photon will later reach a telescope on Earth today at ##λ_0=3645 Angstroms##. Suppose ##λ_{obs}=1215 Angstroms##, the H atom Lyman-alpha line transition. What is ##λ_{em}## if the source is located a comoving distance ##r=500 Mpc## (in present-day units) away from the H atom? Assume ##H_0=70 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}##.

I mainly just want help with part (d).

Homework Equations


[/B]
## ds^2=-c^2dt^2+a(t)^2[dr^2+s_k(r)^2d\Omega^2## but ##ds=0## and ##d\Omega=0##
##H(t)=\frac{1}{a}*\frac{da}{dt}##
##\frac{\lambda_{em}}{a(t_{em})}=\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{a(t_{obs})}##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For part (a) I intergrated and got ## r=c\int\limits_{t_{em}}^{t_{obs}} \frac{1}{a(t)} \ dt ##.
For part (b) I used the second equation to get ##a(t)=t^{2/3}##
For part (c) I used the third equation to get ##\frac{\lambda_{em}}{\lambda_{obs}}=\frac{t_{em}^{2/3}}{t_{obs}^{2/3}}##
I'm really lost on part (d) though. I was told that I'm supposed to integrate my answer from (a), but I am not quite sure how to go about that.
##r=c\int\limits_{t_{em}}^{t_{obs}} \frac{1}{t^{2/3}} \ dt = 3c(t_{obs}^{1/3}-t_{em}^{1/3})##
I'm not sure how to get ##\lambda's## from this, and I'm also not sure how to include ##t_0/\lambda_0##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\lambda_{obs}## is not the wavelength observed on Earth at the present time. It is the wavelength observed by a comoving hydrogen atom at some intermediate time ##t_{obs}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joella Kait
Orodruin said:
##\lambda_{obs}## is not the wavelength observed on Earth at the present time. It is the wavelength observed by a comoving hydrogen atom at some intermediate time ##t_{obs}##.
Thanks! I somehow over looked that it said hydrogen atom. For part (d) do you think it's still assuming the same universe as in part (b)?
 
Joella Kait said:
Thanks! I somehow over looked that it said hydrogen atom. For part (d) do you think it's still assuming the same universe as in part (b)?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K