What is the width of the Lagrange points?

AI Thread Summary
Lagrange points, particularly L4 and L5, are stable locations in space where objects can oscillate around them if initially stationary. The discussion highlights that while L1, L2, and L3 are unstable, they allow for quasi-periodic Lissajous orbits with radii up to 200,000 km. However, the specific width of the Lagrange points themselves remains unclear, as the inquiry focuses on their physical dimensions. The stability of these points makes them useful for positioning objects in space during construction or other activities. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the unique properties of Lagrange points in relation to space exploration.
CowedbyWisdom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! I just finishexd reading Death By Black Hole and I was interested in the Lagrange points. Neil talks about how if you placed objects inside of them you could use the points as place holders for objects while building in space. I couldn't seem to find anything about the width of the points. I understand they are circular in shape but does anyone have any idea about how wide these rings are? Thanks in advance.

-Jack
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hello Jack! Welcome to PF! :smile:

L4 and L5 are stable, so a body placed near either should oscillate around it

i haven't done the maths, but i suspect that "near" means anywhere, so long as the body starts stationary (or nearly so) relative to the Lagrange point

(ie, obviously if it has a substantial sideways motion, it'll orbit one of the parent bodies instead, in exactly the same way as it would if it was moving too fast at the the Lagrange point)

L1 L2 and L3 are unstable, but they do have quasi-periodic Lissajous orbits which are used (with radii of up to 200,000 km), see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_points#Stability for details :wink:
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top