What Is the Work Function of Millikan's Hypothetical Metal?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work function of a hypothetical metal based on Millikan's observations of the photoelectric effect. Given the maximum kinetic energies of 0.535 eV and 2.52 eV for different wavelengths of light, participants explore the relationship between energy, frequency, and the work function. The stopping potential (Vo) is identified as crucial for determining the work function, with suggestions to use alternative forms of the photoelectric equation for clarity. The conversation highlights the need for a clear understanding of how to derive Vo from the maximum kinetic energy. Ultimately, the participants seek guidance on completing the calculation of the work function.
TJDF
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The American physicist Robert A. Millikan (1868-1953) won the 1923 Nobel Prize in physics, in part for his work on the photoelectric effect. Assume that Millikan observed for a hypothetical metal a maximum kinetic energy of 0.535 eV when electrons were ejected with 431.7 nm light. When light of 258.6 nm was used, he observed a maximum kinetic energy of 2.52 eV. Using these results, calculate the work function, W0, for the metal, without knowing the value for Planck's constant.

Homework Equations



Vo = [(h/e)*f]-(θ/e)

where θ is the work function.

The Attempt at a Solution



Frequency 1 (using wavelength 1) = 6.94927e14 Hz
Frequency 2 (using wavelength 2) = 1.1601e15 Hz

Delta Frequency = 4.65173e14

Energy 1 (using eV1) =8.571644e-20 J
Energy 2 (using eV2) =4.0375e-19 J

Delta Energy = 3.18032e-19

thus, Delta Energy over Delta Frequency gives me my experimental h...
h = 6.83685e-34 Js

That's all fine and good... but

I have NO idea how to solve for the work function.

Greatly appreciate a reply, this is my last question of the day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm... still no luck on this one yet. ideas?
 
some progress...

so e = 1.60e-19 C

f will equal 0... so...

Vo = θ/e ; θ = e*Vo = (1.60e-19J)*( ? V)

hmmmm... how to figure out Vo?
 
Hi TJDF,

TJDF said:
some progress...

so e = 1.60e-19 C

f will equal 0... so...

Vo = θ/e ; θ = e*Vo = (1.60e-19J)*( ? V)

hmmmm... how to figure out Vo?


Vo is the stopping potential, which is the potential required to stop even those electrons with the maximum kinetic energy. In that case, the maximum kinetic energy is being converted completely into potential energy. Do you see how to calculate Vo?

(You might also find some other forms of the photoelectric effect equation that have the maximum kinetic energy explicitly, instead of the stopping potential; those forms would be more straightforward for this problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top