What Is Wrong with My Washer Method Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter talk2glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid formed by rotating the region bounded by x = 1 - y^4 around the line y = -4 using the washer method. The user attempted to set up the integral but received an error, leading to confusion about the correct setup. Key points include the identification of the outer and inner radii, with the outer radius being R = y + 4 and the inner radius being r = 4. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing bounds, as the function is undefined at y = 0, which complicates the volume calculation. Ultimately, the user seeks clarity on the integration limits and the implications of the lower bound on volume calculation.
talk2glenn

Homework Statement



The region bounded by x = 1 - y4, is rotated about the line y = -4.
The volume of the resulting solid is:

Homework Equations



Area of a circle: \pir2
Washer method solution: \int_a^{b} pi*[f(x)^2-g(x)^2]

The Attempt at a Solution



I divided the covered region into two circles: outer with R = 4 + y and inner with r = 4. Then solved using washer method, on the integral from 0 to 1 with respect to x.

\pi\int_0^{1} [4+(1-x)^{1/4}]^2-4^2dx = 106\pi/15

Told this is wrong by the computer. Very frustrating, as I can see no other way to set up this integral, having drawn the diagrams. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the R = y + 4, but what's the R = 4?

What I get for the solid is an upside-down cake turned on its side and with the bottom extended forever so I get an infinite volume that is curve-cone shaped with an indentation in the "top" (the part starting at the level of x=1 and closing up at x=-255). Haven't done math in so long that I have no idea what the washer method is so can't help you with that.
 
You seem to have the shape correct, but the function is undefined at y = 0 (a global min), so practically speaking the x-axis is an unspoken lower bound. This is why I subtract an inner circle of radius 4.

Otherwise, absent this lower bound, you do indeed have an infinite volume beneath the curve. There is also a given bound at x=0 that I didn't mention in the setup.

Does that clear it up?
 
I don't understand your statement that there is a lower bound on the function but no matter because even with that lower bound the volume is still infinite and I don't see why you say it is not? You have an infinite volumn with a cylinder cut out of the middle, so it is still an infinite volume. Am I missing something?
 
Why do you integrate from 0 to 1 ? The problem makes no statement about this.

Is there more to the problem than you have stated?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top