What Journals are wisest to follow?

AI Thread Summary
For those studying Biotechnology with interests in cell signaling, gene transcription, and molecular genetics, seeking out relevant journals is essential for staying informed. Recommendations include focusing on journals that publish high-quality research in these areas, particularly those that align with pharmaceutical and biotech applications. Utilizing platforms like PubMed for targeted searches using specific keywords is advised, especially starting with review articles to gain a comprehensive understanding of the field. The discussion also touches on reading habits, noting that many researchers prioritize figures and conclusions over reading entire articles, suggesting that the approach may vary based on individual needs and expertise. Overall, a strategic combination of following key journals and utilizing research databases can enhance knowledge in these specialized topics.
thE3nigma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I wanted some advice as to what journals I could follow based on my interests.

I am currently studying Biotechnology (my interest), but I am interested as well in cell signalling (particularly as it applies to activation/deactivation of genes), medicine (therapeutics, drugs, pharmaceuticals really), and very much in the area of gene transcription, control, and genome structure/function. Basically anything to do with molecular genetics and its application in the pharmaceutical/biotech industries.

I was hoping that I could get some advice from the senior members of this forum as to what are some of the best journals to follow specifically on these topics. Also is it better to follow journals (that is the archives, past articles) or should I just go to something like PubMed and search for past articles on these topics?

I thank you all for your help.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Its probably better if you go to pubmed and do search a search with specific key words. You might want to limit you search to reviews at the beginning just to get a sense of the field.
 
Ok so just reviews in the beginning.

Just a side question. Do people really always read the whole articles? As in everything from a-z (protocols, methods, data and conclusions) or do most readers focus on data and conclusions. I am assuming it depends on who is actually reading the paper, correct?
 
Personally, when I read a research paper, I look at the figures and read the captions (i.e. focus on the data) and then read the conclusions. If I need additional clarification, I'll read the methods and possibly the introduction- just to get additional references and supplementary information.
 
Thanks Andy for the advice. That sounds like a very smart way of staying up to date with papers.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top