How Does Special Relativity Explain Particle Attraction?

analyst5
Messages
190
Reaction score
2
Hi folks,
I was thinking about this question for some time and I need some clarification. What is the take by relativity on electromagnetic forces and attraction between molecules, and other particles on a smaller scale? How do they compose objects on a macro level? I know that action at distance is impossible in relativity, so I believe that this facr certainly has some impact in the answer.

I'm looking forward to the answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that action at distance is impossible in relativity
You can express everything with fields and local field equations, without instantaneous actions at a distance.

Quantum field theory includes special relativity, and it leads to the classical forces between charged particles in the limit of low energies (non-relativistic particles).
 
But the general problem of connecting the various forces is one of the important problems in modern physics. We really don't know the full answer to that question.
 
I don't see how connecting the different forces (mainly gravity with the other forces) is related to the question. All current (fundamental) descriptions of forces are based on special relativity.
 
mfb said:
I don't see how connecting the different forces (mainly gravity with the other forces) is related to the question. All current (fundamental) descriptions of forces are based on special relativity.

Can you describe any of those in short terms?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top