What kind of bosons can have Bose-Einstein Condensation?

paradoxwst
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I notice that some bosons can exhibit Bose-Einstein condensation while others cannot (photons, phonons). Is it true that the bosons can have BEC only when the total number of particles is conserved? In this case, the chemical potential approaches zero at T_c, and particles begin to cluster (significantly) in the ground state.

Btw, is the total number of phonons conserved in a system? If it is not, for photons and phonons, \mu=0 as particles are not conserved. Thus, no BEC?

What distinguishes between photons and some other bosons such that the total number of particles can be conserved or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for phonons that depends also somewhat on definition. Consider as an example some ferroelectric material like Sr Ti O_3. At elevated temperatures, the Ti atom sits on the mean in the center of an octahedron defined by the oxygen atoms. At lower temperatures the system changes from cubic symmetry to some lower symmetry and the Ti atoms are on the mean not in the center of gravity of the oxygen atoms. You may describe the situation in two different ways: In the first description, you quantize the motion always around the corresponding equilibrium position. It is clear that at lower and lower temperatures the number of phonons decreases and there is no BEC.
In the second point of view you always quantize the motion around the center of the octahedron. Then, the expectation value of the phonon field phi does not vanish in the ground state of low symmetry, <0|phi|0> neq 0, and you could describe this as a BEC of the phonons.
 
DrDu said:
You may describe the situation in two different ways: In the first description, you quantize the motion always around the corresponding equilibrium position. It is clear that at lower and lower temperatures the number of phonons decreases and there is no BEC.
In the second point of view you always quantize the motion around the center of the octahedron. Then, the expectation value of the phonon field phi does not vanish in the ground state of low symmetry, <0|phi|0> neq 0, and you could describe this as a BEC of the phonons.

So it means whether there is phonon BEC depends on how you quantize the system? But does it have any physical implications whether there is BEC or not? Is the ambiguity a particular trait of phonons (quasiparticles)? Rubidium atoms have BEC regardless of how you describe it right?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top