What kind of energy is released when matter and antimatter collide?

AI Thread Summary
Matter-antimatter collisions primarily produce energy in the form of pions, with lower energy outputs compared to cosmic rays, which can reach around 10^21 electron volts. The discussion suggests that cosmic rays, predominantly composed of protons, are too energetic to be formed from such collisions. Annihilation events release high-energy particles, but the energy per event remains limited. The potential energy from a significant antimatter-matter collision, such as 1 kg of antimatter with 500 g of matter, is still relatively modest compared to cosmic ray energies. Overall, the energy dynamics of matter-antimatter interactions differ significantly from those of cosmic rays.
ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Could ultra high-energy cosmic rays be the result of matter-antimatter collision?

What would be a unique antimatter-matter anihilation signature should say a 10 gram rock of antimatter were to collide into a meteor?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think cosmic rays are too energetic to be formed in such a manner.

See for instance http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/topics/snr_group/cosmic_rays.html

10^21 electron volts!

Matter-antimatter annhilation will yield most of the energy in pions, some charged, some uncharged. You'll get much lower energies, I'm sure (a proton mass is only 1 Gev which is an upper limit). Cosmic rays can have about 12 orders of magnitude more energy than this.

Cosmic rays are nuclei, protons, or electrons (see above), apparently mostly protons (from the above URL) and not pions. There will also be some x-rays in matter-antimatter annhilation from the electron-positron annhiliation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
I think cosmic rays are too energetic to be formed in such a manner.

See for instance http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/topics/snr_group/cosmic_rays.html

10^21 electron volts!

Matter-antimatter annhilation will yield most of the energy in pions, some charged, some uncharged. You'll get much lower energies, I'm sure (a proton mass is only 1 Gev which is an upper limit). Cosmic rays can have about 12 orders of magnitude more energy than this.

Cosmic rays are nuclei, protons, or electrons (see above), apparently mostly protons (from the above URL) and not pions. There will also be some x-rays in matter-antimatter annhilation from the electron-positron annhiliation.

I was thinking along the lines of say 1 kg of antimatter colliding with say 500g of matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
10^21 electron volts!

To put that in perspective that is ~100 Joules, roughly the energy of a baseball traveling at 120 km/h (or ~ 80 Miles/hr)

Remember that this thing is probably a proton or something of similar mass. It's just mind blowing :smile:
 
Last edited:
ensabah6 said:
I was thinking along the lines of say 1 kg of antimatter colliding with say 500g of matter.

But each annihilation event is from one subatomic matter particle meeting one subatomic anti-matter particle giving of a number of high energy particles as a result. The more matter and anti-matter particle you annihilate the more high energy particles you produce, but they won't have any more energy.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top