What level are the books 'Elements de Mathematiques' by Bourbaki?

  • Context: Foundations 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the appropriate academic level of the books 'Elements de Mathematiques' by Bourbaki and their suitability for self-study, particularly for undergraduate students. Participants explore the nature of these texts, their rigor, and how they compare to other mathematical literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether 'Elements de Mathematiques' is suitable for undergraduate or graduate study and seeks recommendations for reading order.
  • Another participant suggests that the books are neither strictly undergraduate nor graduate level and expresses a personal recommendation against studying from them.
  • A different viewpoint characterizes the texts as more of an encyclopedia rather than traditional textbooks, emphasizing their axiomatic framework and the finality of the mathematical concepts presented.
  • Some participants discuss the rigor of Bourbaki's work, with one suggesting that its rigor might make it easier for self-study, while another finds it challenging to read.
  • A participant mentions their intention to study abstract algebra using Bourbaki and expresses a preference against another text, questioning its rigor.
  • There is a query about the value of reading 'Undergraduate Algebra' by Lang before approaching Bourbaki, along with a question regarding the readability of Lang's book.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the accessibility and educational value of Bourbaki's texts, with no clear consensus on their suitability for self-study or their level of difficulty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note varying perceptions of rigor and readability, which may depend on individual backgrounds and preferences. The discussion does not resolve the question of the books' appropriateness for different academic levels.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to undergraduate students considering self-study in mathematics, particularly those evaluating the suitability of Bourbaki's works and comparing them to other texts.

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
What level(undergraduate or graduate) are the books Elements de Mathematiques by Bourbaki?Is good if I read it?If I like to read(undergraduate) then I must read following which order?(Eg first I must read book The Set theory).By the way,what about The Treatise on analysis by Dieudonne?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Best is try to read and see for yourself if it is good for you or not. As to the level, I would say, no, they are neither undergrad nor grad level. Same for the Treatise, you can think of it as the analysis text Bourbaki never wrote. I personaly wouldn't recommend to study from those books.
 
I think one should consider them not as textbooks at all. It's more like an encyclopedia which puts math into an axiomatic framework. It's so-to-say the "final result" of a finished "mathematical edifice". I don't think that one can learn, how math is really done as a creative process.
 
I think because it is rigorous,it might be easy to read for self studying?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier
I do not find them easy to read, but that's just me. How about you choose a subject and pick up a volume of Bourbaki on this matter? Tell us what the subject is and also what your impression of the style is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
I will begin abstract algebra, so I choose Algebra chapter 1-3 by Bourbaki. I do not like Fraleigh, because it seems to me not very rigorous(is that correct?)
 
Alright, then come back here with your honest opinion on Bourbaki's Algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier
Is it good to read Undergraduate Algebra by Lang before reading Bourbaki(self studying)? Is the Lang's book easy to read?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
814
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K